|
CLD INFOSHEETS
College Opportunities for
Students With Learning Disabilities
College
as a Realistic Option for Students with LD
During the last quarter century, the inclusion movement has had
a profound effect on access to college for students with learning
disabilities (LD). Federal law has required that students with disabilities
be educated in the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE). Almost 30%
of students with LD are now graduating from high school with a diploma,
and 56% of these graduates enroll in college. The percentage of
full-time college freshmen with a disability increased from 2.3%
in 1978 to 9.8% in 1998. College enrollment of students with LD
alone has grown from 1.2% of the freshmen class in 1984 to 3.5%
in 1998. Given that students with LD in the public schools increased
by 37% in the 1990s and that the 1997 Amendments to the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act of 1990 (IDEA) have put greater
emphasis on transition planning for students with disabilities,
we can expect to see growing numbers of students with LD attending
postsecondary education.
The Challenge
of College for Students with LD
Because the prescriptive IDEA requiring a free, appropriate education
is not applicable to postsecondary settings, special education services,
assessment, and personnel are not mandated for post?high school
settings. The applicable sections of two civil rights laws-Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990-require equal access for "otherwise qualified" students
with significant impairments. These statutes provide protections
and supports but make the transition from high school to postsecondary
education challenging for students with LD. This is due to the fact
that success in college requires more diligence, self-control, self-evaluation,
decision making, and goal setting-in short, self-determination.
For example, the difference in class time versus study time requires
the student to select the amount of time needed to read texts, review
notes, complete assignments, and study, as well as to schedule that
time and be disciplined enough to independently meet those obligations.
This must be done without benefit of supervision from parents or
special education teachers and in spite of the distractions offered
by college life. Whereas high school is fairly structured, college
environments require students to manage their own time and organize
their days and nights. This dramatic difference in personal freedom,
combined with the increased demand for critical thinking and independent
learning, make self-determination a necessary skill for college
success.
Characteristics
of Successful College Students with LD
Self-determination (i.e., making conscious decisions to take charge
of one's life and make personal adaptations to succeed) is critical
for success in both academics and employment. Related characteristics
include being goal oriented, being persistent, reinterpreting one's
LD experiences to focus on abilities, using problem solving, seeking
assistance through supportive people, choosing environments that
maximize strengths and compensate for weaknesses, and employing
effective social skills in a variety of areas (e.g., classrooms,
physical education settings, social situations with and without
members of the opposite gender). In a similar vein, college students
with LD themselves have identified managing time, making connections,
choosing courses carefully, finding and using mentors and supportive
peers, taking responsibility for self, matching work to assessments,
and modifying strategies based on feedback as necessary characteristics
for a productive postsecondary experience.
Transition
Planning for College
Effective transition to college is achieved through collaboration
involving the school, the family, and most of all, the student to
develop outcome-oriented plans based on the student's needs, preferences,
abilities, and interests. The 1997 IDEA amendments noted that it
is the student, not the parent, who is the responsible person once
the student has reached the age of majority, thus emphasizing the
student's need to take a significant role in the transition process.
Although all college-bound students face this transition, students
with LD must address additional challenges; navigating the postsecondary
system under Section 504 and ADA requires self-identification, presentation
of valid documentation, formal requests for services, and expectations
that the student will meet technical standards and be otherwise
qualified. Having a learning disability does not guarantee the student
a seat in a college classroom, nor does it guarantee special considerations
not specifically outlined in Section 504 or ADA.
The "conventional wisdom" regarding preparation for college had
suggested that students should achieve good grades by obtaining
(a) accommodations and course waivers in areas affected by the learning
disability and (b) subject-matter tutoring in the resource room.
This is not an effective approach for college success. Instead,
the transition process should begin at age 14 with a course of study
planned to meet the requirements of any potential college. Most
colleges do not allow course waivers; therefore, courses waived
or avoided because of a learning disability may jeopardize college
admission or may have to be taken as prerequisites to the college
curriculum. Students should receive instruction to develop learning
strategies and social skills that will help them become successful
independent learners in the college setting. Because accommodations
provided in high school are not necessarily available in college,
students must develop the organization, time management, problem-solving,
study, and social skills they will need in the postsecondary setting.
Another area of transition planning relates to eligibility for services
and determination of reasonable accommodations. Colleges expect
students with LD to provide recent (i.e., less than 3-year-old)
documentation of the learning disability and assessment data that
justify requested accommodations. It is therefore recommended that
a complete psycho-educational battery be completed in the sophomore
or junior year that can be used for those purposes as well as to
request accommodations on the SAT or ACT examinations (www.acts.org;
www.collegeboard. org). Many colleges and testing organizations
have specific requirements for LD documentation that should be reviewed
prior to the evaluation (www.ets.org; www.ahead.org; www. cped.uconn.edu).
The independence and self-determination skills students develop
by participating in the transition planning process should provide
the basis for a productive college experience.
Selecting
a College
Given that postsecondary education may cost more than $100,000,
selecting a college is a most important process. For all prospective
students, an appropriate match to a postsecondary institution must
be made. Students with LD should consider the entire continuum of
postsecondary education, including adult education, GED programs,
transitional college preparatory programs, vocational/technical
schools and colleges, as well as traditional 2- and 4-year colleges.
Consulting a college guide to identify schools with the desired
characteristics in terms of size of institution, type (e.g., 2-
or 4-year), competitiveness, types of programs (e.g., culinary arts,
broadcasting), and proximity to home is an appropriate beginning
to the process. Specific considerations for students with LD may
relate to foreign language or math requirements, class size, liberal
arts core courses, or the degree to which admissions criteria are
based on standardized test scores.
In recent years, more guidance in how to select effective postsecondary
disability support services has been available. For example, competencies
for personnel in offices for students with disabilities (i.e., Professional
Standards), essential services for offices for students with disabilities
(i.e., Program Standards), and specification of how disability personnel
should act (i.e., Code of Ethics) have been delineated. Institutions
of higher education that adhere to these standards will offer state-of-the-art
services. Of particular importance to students with LD are standards
related to fostering self-advocacy, providing instruction in learning
strategies, specifying policies and procedures for students with
disabilities, and doing program evaluation. Personnel from these
programs should not only be able to satisfactorily answer all your
questions but also provide written information and evaluation data
to support their claims.
Prepared by Stan Shaw
Resources
Brinckerhoff, L. C., McGuire, J. M., & Shaw, S. F. (2002). Postsecondary
education and transition for students with learning disabilities
(2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Deshler, D., Ellis, E., & Lenz, K. (1996). Teaching adolescents
with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.). Denver:
Love.
Kravets, M., & Wax, I. F. (1999). The K & W guide to colleges for
the learning disabled (5th ed.). New York: Random House.
Mangrum, C. T., & Strichart, S. S. (1997). Peterson's colleges with
programs for students with learning disabilities and attention-deficit
disorders. Princeton, NJ: Peterson's.
Price, L. A. (1997). The development and implementation of a code
of ethical behavior for postsecondary personnel. Journal of Postsecondary
Education and Disability, 12(3), 36-44.
Price, L., & Field, S. (in press). Special issue on adults with
learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education.
Shaw, S. F., & Dukes, L. L. (2001). Program standards for disability
services in higher education. Journal of Postsecondary Education
and Disability, 14(2), 81-89.
Shaw, S. F., McGuire, J. M., & Madaus, J. W. (1997). Standards of
professional practice. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability,
12(3), 26-35.
|