Sample Syllabus

Foundations of Effective Assessment and Inclusion


Foundations of Effective Assessment and Inclusion

3 Semester Credits
Hybrid
Undergraduate
Various Credentials

Sample Syllabus

Foundations of Effective Assessment and Inclusion


  1. Syllabus Used in Course for: Special Education Undergraduate Teacher Candidates in Early Childhood (birth to 5) Special Education, Mild/Moderate Special Education (K-12) and Severe Special Education (K-12) as well as transition services (ages 18-21)
  2. Instructor:
    Note to User: Include contact information in this section.

    Department:
    Office:
    Phone:
    E-mail Address:
    Office Hours:

  3. Course Description: The purpose of this course is to provide prospective special education teachers with a foundation in effective assessment and instructional practices. Overall, you will learn terminology to describe various assessment and instructional practices and the fundamental principles that provide the foundation for effective instruction. You will gain a basic understanding of different types of assessment and how they are best used to inform instruction. In addition, we will describe a framework for dissecting the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and examine the basis for mastery learning approaches and other instructional procedures that represent current best practices in education. This will provide you with a framework to design assessment strategies that are integrated into instruction and state curriculum standards, to monitor pupil performance, and to critically analyze instruction. Finally, you will learn the responsibilities of an evidence-based educator and have opportunities to apply the foundational principles of effective instruction in assignments and class activities, as well as your practicum setting for this semester.
  4. Required Texts/Readings:

    A course reader may be purchased at the bookstore in paper format. If you choose to download and print each article, they are posted on the university’s course management system (CANVAS). Readings should be completed prior to class.

    Course Reader Articles

    Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Chapter 2. In Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching (pp. 23-41). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Browder, D. M., & Spooner, F. (2011). (pp. 72-85). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Haydon, T., MacSuga-Gage, A. S., Simonsen, B., & Hawkins, R. (2012). Opportunities to respond: A key component of effective instruction. Beyond Behavior, 22(1), 1-12.
    Hauser, M. D. (2017). The essential and interrelated components of evidenced-based IEPs: A user’s guide. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(6), 420-428.
    Jones, E. D., Souther, W. T., & Brigham, F. J. (1998). Curriculum-based assessment: Testing what is taught and teaching what is tested. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33(4), 239-249.
    Jung, L. A. (2007). Writing SMART objectives and strategies that fit the ROUTINE. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(4), 54-58.
    Konrad, M., Helf, S., & Joseph, L. M. (2011). Evidence-based instruction is not enough: Strategies for increasing instructional efficiency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 47(2), 67-74.
    Konrad, M., Keesey, S., Ressa, V. A., Alexeeff, M., Chan, P. E., & Peters, M. T. (2014). Setting clear learning targets to guide instruction for all students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(2), 76-85.
    Kretlow, A., & Blatz, S. (2011). The ABC’s of evidence-based practice for teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43, 8-19.
    Lignugaris/Kraft, B., Marchand-Martella, N., & Marchand-Martella, R. (2001). Strategies for writing better goals and short term objectives. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 52-58.
    Lynch, S., & Adams, P. (2008). Developing standards-based individualized education program objectives for students with significant needs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 36-39.
    Prater, M. A. (1992). Increasing time-on-task in the classroom: Suggestions for improving the amount of time learners spend in on-task behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28(1), 22-27.
    Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 39, 12-19.
    Salend, S. J. (2008). Determining appropriate testing accommodations: Complying with NCLB and IDEA. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(4), 14-22.
    Pierangelo, R., & Guiliani, G. A. (2017). Chapter 2: Methods of assessment and testing considerations. In Assessment in Special Education: A Practical Approach (pp. 17-30, 5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Sample Syllabus

Foundations of Effective Assessment and Inclusion


  1. This University’s Conceptual Framework: This university is accredited by the Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC) which does not use a conceptual framework. However, the university does evaluate its teacher education program by TEAC’s principles and standards for teacher education programs. Specifically, courses are evaluated by Quality Principle I: Evidence of candidate learning.

    • 1.1 Subject matter knowledge
    • 1.2 Pedagogical knowledge
    • 1.3 Caring and effective teaching skills
    • 1.4 Cross-cutting themes
      • 1.4.1 Learning how to learn
      • 1.4.2 Multicultural perspectives/accuracy
      • 1.4.3 Technology
  2. 6. and 7. Standards of Effective Practice and Course Objectives

    Note to User: Be sure to include your states’ special educator preparation standards in the table below.

    IDEA Center Learning Objective Course Objectives Evaluation CAEP
    Principle
    CEC
    Principle
    InTASC
    Principle
    TEAC
    Principle
    Gaining factual knowledge Describe appropriate uses for standardized assessment and appropriate uses for curriculum based assessment. Study Guides 2 and 3, Assignment 2, Final 1.1
    1.2
    1.3
    1.4
    1.5
    3, 4 6 1.2
    Define common terms used to interpret standardized assessments. Study Guide 3, Assignment 2, Final 1.1
    1.4
    1.5
    4 6 1.2
    Identify domains/strands and standards within CCSS. Assignment 1, Final 1.1
    1.4
    3 4 1.1
    Identify the components of goals and short-term objectives. Study Guide 5 1.1
    1.2
    1.4
    1.5
    3 4, 6, 7 1.2
    Describe the sequence that leads from identification and assessment to the delivery of effective instruction. Study Guides 1-9, Assignments 1-7, Final 1.1
    1.2
    1.3
    1.4
    1.5
    1, 2, 3, 4. 5 4, 5, 6, 7 1.2
    Define the components of time management. Study Guide 7, Assignment 6 1.1
    1.5
    2 3, 7, 8 1.2
    Learning fundamental principles, generalizations, or theories Describe the seven steps for developing curriculum-based assessments. Study Guides 1-9, Assignments 1-7, Final 1.1
    1.2
    1.3
    1.4
    1.5
    1, 2, 3, 4. 5 4, 5, 6, 7 1.2
    Describe the philosophical basis for effective teaching and the components of an effective lesson cycle. Study Guides 1, 2 and 8, Final 1.1
    1.4
    1.5
    2, 5, 6 7, 8, 9 1.2
    Describe evidence-based teaching practices and their application with various students with disabilities including getting student’s attention, clearly defining the vehicle of instruction, providing sufficient opportunities to respond, reinforcing correct responses, correcting errors, and evaluating mastery. Study Guides 1-9, Assignments 1-7, Final 1.1
    1.3
    1.5
    1, 2, 3, 4, 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 1.2
    Describe the decision-making skills that characterize effective teachers. Study Guide 1, 2, 8 and 9, Assignment 5-7 1.1
    1.2
    1.5
    6, 7 9, 10 1.2
    Describe critical instructional variables for managing classroom behavior. Study Guide 9, Assignment 6 1.1
    1.2
    1.5
    2, 4, 5 3, 6, 8 1.2
    Learning to apply course material Develop and evaluate a curriculum-based assessment. Study Guide 3, Assignment 3 1.1
    1.2
    1.3
    1.4
    1.5
    1, 2, 3, 4 4, 5, 6 1.1, 1.2
    Interpret test scores from standardized and informal assessment instruments. Study Guide 3, Final 1.1
    1.3
    1.5
    4 6 1.2
    Describe critical function in CCSS and the integration of critical function, student’s symbolic level, and present level of performance to determine goals and objectives. Assignment 1, Final 1.1
    1.2
    1.3
    1.4
    1.5
    3, 4 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 1.1, 1.2
    Write short-term objectives for academic and personal-social skill areas. Study Guide 5, Assignment 4 1.1
    1.2
    1.3
    1.4
    1.5
    1, 2, 3, 4 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 1.2
    Describe supports needed to reduce instructional demand for ELL students, students with severe disabilities, and young children with disabilities. Study Guide 3, Final 1.1
    1.2
    1.5
    1, 2, 3, 5 1, 8 1.2, 1.4.2
    Describe how multicultural educational practices might be integrated into an effective teaching structure. Study Guides 8 and 9, Final 1.1
    1.2
    1.5
    1, 2, 5 1, 7, 8 1.2, 1.4.2
    Apply time management components to classroom settings. Study Guide 7, Assignment 6 1.1
    1.2
    1.5
    2 3, 8 1.2
    Critique and suggest learning environment modifications that promote student’s academic participation. Study Guide 7, Assignment 6 1.1
    1.2
    1.5
    1, 2, 5 3, 6, 8 1.2
    Describe instructional procedures to promote transfer to mainstream educational settings and successful inclusion. Study Guides 7-9, Final 1.1
    1.5
    1, 2, 3, 4, 5 7, 8 1.2
    Describe the characteristics of an evidence-based educator, and the importance of fidelity of implementation. Assignment 5, Final 1.1
    1.2
    1.5
    4, 6, 7 9, 10 1.2, 1.4.1
  1. Instructional Strategies: A wide variety of instructional strategies are implemented.

    1. Reflect on readings (the study guides provide direction)
    2. Participate in group activities
    3. Provide feedback to peers on assignments
    4. Interact during class discussions
    5. Complete applied assignments/case studies (e.g., analyze the core curriculum, evaluate curriculum-based assessment, write goals/objectives, plan evidence-based lessons)
    6. Complete selected IRIS STAR Legacy Modules
    7. Present with class members on Evidence-Based Practices
  2. Diversity and Cultural Relevancy:
    Note to User: Be sure to include your university’s diversity statement here.

    Build a socially and intellectually vibrant campus community, enhanced by the diversity of its faculty, staff, and students.

Sample Syllabus

Foundations of Effective Assessment and Inclusion


  1. Course Requirements:

    Explanations and further instructions for each assignment can be found on the course management system (CANVAS). Quizzes and exams are to be taken at the scheduled time. No exceptions and no make-ups. You will have one week after quizzes are returned to challenge them. Challenges will not be accepted after one week. Challenges must be made in writing.

    1. Exam: The final exam will be administered in the testing center. The exam is comprehensive.
    2. Assignments:
      1. A1: Common Core State Standards Overview. Review online articles on history and purpose of the Common Core and key shifts in English Language Arts and Mathematics.
      2. A2: Collaboratively Analyze the Subject Assignment. Unpack an assigned Common Core State Standard as demonstrated in class with a partner. Use the forms provided within the assignment on CANVAS.
      3. A3: Independently Analyze the Subject Assignment. Unpack an assigned Common Core State Standard as demonstrated in class. Use the forms provided within the assignment on CANVAS.
      4. A4: IRIS Module. Classroom Assessment (Part 1): An Introduction to Monitoring Academic Achievement in the Classroom. Complete the module assessment questions within the CANVAS assignment.
        http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/gpm/
      5. A5: Classroom/Academic Assessment. Evaluate assessments to determine if they are a good measure of student mastery on Common Core standards. Use the assignment guidelines and scoring rubric on CANVAS to complete the assignment.
      6. A6: IRIS Modules (2). Evidence-Based Practices (Part 1): Identifying and Selecting a Practice of Program https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/ebp_01/ and Evidence-Based Practices (Part 2): Implementing a Practice or Program with Fidelity https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/ebp_02 Complete the module assessment questions for both Modules within the CANVAS assignment.
      7. A7: Goals and Objectives Assignment. Write goals and objectives based on a case study related to your emphasis area. Find your case study and the assessment conversion table to help you interpret the norm referenced achievement or behavior data on CANVAS.
      8. A8: Time Management/Academic Learning Time Assignment. Conduct observations during transition times in your practicum classroom or in another classroom in the school (preferred). Calculate the mean transition time, summarize positive aspects of the transition times, and describe how the transition times might be improved based on suggestions in your reading. Conduct additional observations in the same setting using the data sheet provided to record total engaged time of two students during a 15-minute period. Summarize the data and describe the students’ behaviors that contributed to reduced engaged time and how the engaged time might be increased. More information and the scoring rubric are on CANVAS.
      9. A9: Evidence-Based Practices Group Presentation. Research an assigned evidenced-based practice with an assigned group. Present the practice in class using the explicit instruction practices learned in class. Provide a resource for other students in the class. Evaluate other team members on contribution and participation.
    3. Reading Study Guides: Reading Study Guides for all of the readings should be completed on CANVAS before that topic is discussed in class. The guides include factual and applied questions.
    4. Participation Points: At the beginning and during each class, questions about readings, previous class sessions, and assignments will be asked using Nearpod. These questions might also be included on the final.
  2. Evaluation: The grade for the class will be determined by weighting assignments, quizzes, and exams.
    Assignment Percentage of Grade
    Reading Guides (7) 40%
    Assignments (9) 35%
    Participation 10%
    Exam 15%
       
    Total 100%

    Letter grades will be issued according to the following percentages:

    Grade Percentage
    A 95 – 100%
    A- 90 – 94%
    B+ 88 – 89%
    B 84 – 87%
    B- 80 – 83%
    C+ 78 – 79%
    C 74 – 77%
    C- 70 – 73%
    D+ 68 – 69%
    D 60 – 67%
    F Below 60%

    Assignments should be submitted via the assignment drop box in CANVAS by 15 minutes before the start of class on the day they are due. Do not email assignments to the instructor. All assignments will be accepted only if their file names are labeled with your last name, first two letters of your first name, and the assignment number (e.g., SpencerTrA1). Further instructions and scoring rubrics for assignments will be available on CANVAS and discussed in class.

    No late assignments are accepted.

Sample Syllabus

Foundations of Effective Assessment and Inclusion


  1. Class Schedule/Week at a Glance: Every attempt will be made to keep on schedule, however, if any changes are deemed necessary by the instructor, you will be notified of the changes in advance. Highlighted topics are online lessons.
    Schedule subject to change
    Date Topic Readings to be done before class Assignments due before class
    Week 1

    Class Overview

    Introduction to Effective Instruction

       
    Week 2

    Evidence-Based Practice

    Explicit Instruction

    Rosenshine, 2012

    Kretlow & Blatz, 2011

    Pretest

    Reading Study Guide 1

    Week 3

    Explicit Instruction (cont.)

    Archer & Hughes, 2011

     
    Week 4

    Analyze the Subject: Common Core State Standards

    Online Common Core Readings (see CANVAS)

    Assignment 1: CCSS Overview

    Week 5

    Analyze the Subject: Learning Targets and Standards-Based IEPs

    Lynch & Adams, 2008

    Konrad et al., 2014

    Reading Study Guide 2

    Week 6

    Assessment for Eligibility

    Pierangelo & Guiliani, 2017

    Saland, 2008

    Reading Study Guide 3

    Assignment 2: Collaboratively Analyze the Subject 

    Week 7

    Classroom/Academic Assessment

    Jones et al., 1998

    Browder and Spooner, 2011

    Curriculum Based Assessment Rubric

    Assignment 3: Independently Analyze the Subject

    Reading Study Guide 4

    Week 8

    Classroom/Academic Assessment (cont.)

    IRIS Module: Classroom Assessment (Part 1)

    Assignment 4: IRIS Module: Classroom Assessment (Part 1)

    Week 9

    Designing Instructional Programs: Goals and Objectives

    Lignugaris/Kraft et al., 2001

    Jung, 2007

    Hauser, 2017

    Reading Study Guide 5

    Assignment 5: Classroom/Academic Assessment

    Week 10

    Goals and Objectives (cont.)

       
    Week 11

    Evidence-Based Practices

    No class meeting– complete the following modules:

    IRIS Module: Evidence-Based Practices (Part 1)

    IRIS Module: Evidence-Based Practices (Part 2)

    Assignment 6: IRIS Modules: Evidence-Based Practices (Parts 1 and 2)

    Week 12

    Progress Monitoring Systems

    Time Management

    Prater, 1992

    Konrad, Helf, & Joseph, 2011

    Review Browder and Spooner, 2011

    Reading Study Guide 6

    Assignment 7: Goals and Objectives

    Week 13

    No Class: University Break

       
    Week 14

    Eliciting Student Responses

    Academic Feedback

    Effective Teaching Cycle

    Haydon et al., 2012

    Archer & Hughes, 2011, pp. 23-41

    Reading Study Guide 7

    Week 15

    Evidence-Based Practices Presentations

    Post-test

     

    Assignment 8: Time Management and Academic Learning Time

    Assignment 9: Evidence-Based Practices Presentation documents

    Finals
    Week

    Final Exam in Testing Center

       

Sample Syllabus

Foundations of Effective Assessment and Inclusion


13. Other Resources and Materials

Sample Syllabus

Foundations of Effective Assessment and Inclusion


  1. Special Accommodations:
    Note to User: Be sure to include your university’s statement about special accommodations/students with disabilities here.

    If a student has a disability that may require some accommodation, the student must document the disability through the Disability Resource Center, preferably during the first week of the course. Any requests for special considerations relating to attendance, pedagogy, taking of examinations, etc. must be discussed with and approved by the Disability Resource Center. In cooperation with the Disability Resource Center, course materials can be provided in alternative formats–large print, audio, diskette or Braille. If you have additional questions or concerns, please contact the head of the Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation.

    Your Emotional Health

    As your instructor I care about more than just your academic success. The university has a mission to support students in all facets of life including emotional wellbeing. All students have access to confidential mental health services through Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS). This includes a full range of counseling services, workshops, and support groups. They are located in the _________.  If suicide is an issue, you can also get help from the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255).

    If you or someone you know has experienced sexual assault, please contact the ________________________________

    If you or someone you know needs emergency services for trauma or life-threatening situations please call 911.

    Other Emergency Resources

    (Phone Number) for after-hours emergency help for trauma and life-threatening situation.  If you are in immediate danger call 911.

    University Police Department information (Links to an external site.)

    Food Banks

    University Food Bank (Links to an external site.)

    Food Pantry locations (Links to an external site.)

    24-Hour Crisis Line and Mobile Crisis Response Team

    For domestic violence and sexual assault services, contact _________ .

    Shelters and Phone numbers, contact _________.

    National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: 1-800-273-8255

  2. Other Course Policies

    Class Etiquette

    A few simple class rules will help promote a positive learning environment:

    1. Arrive to class on time and prepared to listen and participate.
    2. Share your comments and questions with everyone in the class.
    3. Turn cell phones/pagers off or turn on silent mode during class.

    Technical Difficulties

    In the case of technical difficulties, do not contact the instructor; please contact the University Help Desk.

    Student Code

    Students need to adhere to student code by not interfering with the instruction or the learning of other students. The instructor encourages that each student will actively participate in class discussion.

    Participation is defined as occasional verbal contributions to class discussion/activity that extend and enhance group process. Participation is NOT defined as merely attending class.

    Courteous demeanor is defined as (1) arriving on time, (2) leaving at the scheduled time and not before (unless the instructor is notified and has approved the request), (3) listening (not talking) during lecture or class discussion, (4) ringing cell phones, talking on cell phones, text messaging, surfing the internet on laptops, similar activities or other unrelated computer use during class time are not accepted in this course, and (5) do not read the newspaper or other unrelated materials during lecture.

    If this becomes a problem by interfering with the instruction of the instructor and interrupting the learning and listening of other students you may be asked to leave the class.

    Student Responsibilities

    As members of the academic community at this university, students share responsibility for its growth and continued well-being and for maintaining an environment which encourages free inquiry and expression. Students are expected to engage in reasonable and substantial preparation for their coursework, to follow course and class guidelines as set forth in syllabi and as annunciated by their instructors, and to complete all academic exercises with integrity. All interactions with faculty members, staff members, and other students shall be conducted with courtesy, civility, decency, and a concern for personal dignity. These responsibilities are the foundation of the University’s Standards of Conduct (The Honor System – see section V-3. Misconduct – see section V-3).

    Academic Honesty

    Please read through the Honor System Guidelines on the Course Content page under Introduction & Policies. For more information, refer to __________________________. Be aware that we use the following definitions:

    According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to “plagiarize” means

    1. to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own.
    2. to use (another’s production) without crediting the source.
    3. to commit literary theft.
    4. to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source. In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else’s work and lying about it afterward.

    The legitimacy of group work has become an issue in online classes. In the past classes there have been situations in which group work could have been considered cheating or plagiarism. “Legitimate” group work is defined as teacher-authorized activity that takes advantage of consultation with your peers, providing you with ideas, suggestions, and corrections, which you take into consideration in the development of your unique and individual product.

    Reading the text and writing answers to the study guide items, then working closely with other students, comparing study guide answers, and attempting to resolve different understandings is an excellent learning technique and is strongly encouraged. However, failing to do the reading and memorizing answers that another student has written for the study guide is not legitimate group work; it is considered cheating.

    Drafting the assignments, then comparing specific aspects of your product to others’ and discussing teaching situations and SPED issues is legitimate and encouraged. Copying someone else’s quizzes or assignments is not legitimate; it is considered cheating. Completing the assignments as a group project is not legitimate; it is considered cheating. You must make your own decisions about every detail of your assignment.

    Always, if you are unsure about boundaries of legitimate group work, please (1) ask for clarification from the instructors, and (2) make full disclosure so that there is no question about your intentions. We are very happy to talk about these boundaries and work with you to maximize your learning and maintain individual accountability.

    Students who violate the Academic Honesty Policy will be reported to the Student Conduct Officer.