Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility IRIS | The IRIS Module & Materials Development Process

The IRIS Module & Materials Development Process

The method by which the IRIS Center creates open educational resources (OERs) and supporting materials is a multi-stage process of topic selection, development, and refinement that relies on the input and expertise of a wide variety of sources. Because the center’s work is informed continually by feedback, the result is an ever-evolving set of resources based on the input and needs of the center’s consumers, constituents, and the federal government.

The figure below illustrates the plan for systematic development of IRIS Modules and materials. The individual components of this process are further described in the paragraphs below.

Input, Consumer Surveys, Focus Groups, Textbook Analyses, National Standards, Federal Policies, IRIS User Data


The purpose of the input phase of the product-development process is to inform IRIS staff about content gaps in preparation programs for preservice personnel as well as in professional development. The input phase involves the collection of data from five major sources: IRIS consumer surveys, stakeholder focus groups, national standards, federal policies, and IRIS website user data. When needed, textbook analyses are likewise conducted.

Consumer Surveys – A critical part of the input phase was the national needs assessment survey—posted on the IRIS website and disseminated via listserv notice and through the cooperation of IRIS partners. Respondents told us what topic areas they would most like to see future IRIS resources cover.

Focus Groups – Stakeholder focus group members—including personnel from other OSEP-funded centers, as well as members of our own Topic/Service Selection Workgroup—are tasked with helping IRIS to drill down to more specific subject areas based on the results of the needs assessment survey. Convened on an as-needed basis, our stakeholder focus groups will help us to refine future content and use their expertise to help us to avoid product duplication or overlap and redundancy across centers.

National Standards – National standards—for both academic content and teacher certification—likewise inform and guide the IRIS development process, because school districts and teacher preparation programs eager to implement these standards often require resources and materials crucial to the attainment of that goal.

Federal Policies – Federal policies also inform and guide the systematic development of IRIS Modules and materials. When federal laws, regulations, and policies are enacted or modified, IRIS resources will reflect those changes.

IRIS User Data – This component consists of tracking the IRIS website’s visitor data monthly and consolidating the information quarterly. The center will continue to monitor these data to identify trends in interests by our consumers.

Topic and Expert Selection, Workgroups, Steering Committee,OSEP

Topic & Expert Selection

After the input phase, IRIS team members—with guidance and direction from relevant Workgroups (e.g., Topic/Service Selection, MTSS/Intensive Intervention), our Steering Committee, and in collaboration with OSEP—prioritize and select specific topics (e.g., intensive reading intervention) for product development. Additionally, these advisors help determine the type of materials to be developed for each topic (e.g., STAR Legacy Module, a case study, or both). Once topics and resources have been selected, IRIS team members collaborate with OSEP to identify nationally recognized content experts to work with IRIS staff to develop content and supporting products for the resource.

Translate Research to Practice

IRIS resources bridge the research to practice gap by translating the related research about evidence-based instructional and behavioral practices and interventions into practical information that can be easily understood and implemented by educators. To create those resources, we use research-based content provided by researchers, practitioners, and others from a wide variety of backgrounds and perspectives in the selected topic area. When necessary, IRIS personnel supplement the content with additional research and resources.

Resource Development, Content Development, Revisions, Team Review Consultant Review, More Revisions, Expert Feedback, Even more revisions, Expert Panel,final  Revisions, OSEP Approval

Resource Development

Once all of the content is gathered, IRIS content developers transform the subject matter into the appropriate format. The resource goes through several rounds of internal reviews; at the same time, our media production team creates graphics, illustrations, movies, audio clips, and page templates. The final internal review is the most intense, where every aspect of every page—phrasing, terminology, graphics, and overall flow—is scrutinized by the entire development team including, when possible, an external faculty or doctoral student with experience teaching the content in college courses. The content is then sent to an external team member with expertise in both content and instructional design. Feedback from that review is used to revise the resource further before it is sent back to the original content expert to verify that the team translated the research appropriately. More edits are then made; the resource is sent to a panel of 3–5 nationally recognized researchers/content experts. Their reviews are used to refine the content once more before sending it to OSEP for final approval—where edits are often made again—before posting.

Build & Post

Upon final OSEP approval, the resource’s content and graphic elements are organized, formatted, and optimized in the content management system (CMS). To meet 508 and WCAG 2.0 compliance standards for accessibility, alt tags are added to illustrations and photos, and descriptions are provided for detailed graphics (e.g., data charts); videos are formatted and closed-captioning is added; and audio interviews are compressed for optimal Internet use. Additionally, interactive games and activities are developed. Once the pages are built, IRIS staff performs a final review and revision before making the resource available to consumers on the IRIS website, the center’s primary tool for dissemination.

Consumer Feedback & Revision

Additional feedback is collected through field-testing and the online module Feedback Form. Modules are field-tested in college courses—each module is used by at least 50 college students—whose feedback is considered from the novice perspective and any identified problems in the module are addressed. Additionally, all module users have the option of filling out an online module Feedback Form for every Module they complete, providing suggestions for improvement. Comments and ratings from the module Feedback Form are reviewed every week; additional tweaks and improvements to the modules are executed as a result.

In Summary

IRIS uses an array of strategies to gather formative data  to inform our development process so that modules and other materials address topics with the highest need and greatest demand. As work progresses, consumer and stakeholder feedback will continue to be collected in an ongoing manner, guaranteeing the quality, relevance, and usefulness of both the content and its delivery mechanisms. This meticulous, iterative process is one reason that our modules consistently receive such high ratings in these three areas, and will continue to ensure similar excellence for future modules.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email