Information Brief
Systematic Direct Observation
Data Collection Overview
It is often easy for educators to recognize when a student’s behavior is happening and how it is impacting the classroom. However, without data, educators might make incorrect assumptions about how frequently a behavior occurs or how long it lasts based on opinions, feelings, inaccurate recollections, or incomplete information. A systematic process for collecting and analyzing behavioral data in a consistent and accurate manner reduces this subjectivity. Additionally, it helps educators:
- Identify patterns related to when, where, and how behavior occurs
- Make informed decisions about how to address behavior
- Determine if behavioral supports and interventions have been effective
- Decide if an intervention should be continued, adapted, or stopped
- Monitor student progress over time
- Communicate behavioral progress to students, parents, and other school professionals
Operationally Defining a Behavior
Terms to Know
target behavior—the specific behavior in need of change
replacement behavior—an appropriate alternative behavior that serves the same function as the target behavior
To facilitate consistent and accurate data collection, educators must first develop an operational definition of the behavior—a clear and specific description of the behavior to be measured. Educators might collect data on the student’s engagement in a target behavior, replacement behavior, or both.
An operational definition should begin with a broad statement describing the behavior in terms that are:
- Observable—details what the behavior looks and sounds like, not what the student might be thinking or feeling
- Measurable—describes the behavior in such a way that it can be counted or timed
- Actively stated—specifies what the student does rather than what they fail to do
When operationally defining a behavior, it is also helpful to include specific examples and non-examples of the behavior. These additional details help clarify the definition by illustrating what constitutes a behavior when collecting data. Below are examples of operational definitions for a student’s target and replacement behaviors.
Example Definition: Target Behavior
During instructional time, Aiden calls out or verbally responds to the teacher or another student without being called on or given permission to speak.
Examples
- Shouting the answer to a question when not called on
- Making a comment while the teacher or a peer is speaking
- Asking a question without permission
Non-Examples
- Answering a question when called on
- Sharing ideas with a peer during paired discussion time
- Raising a hand and waiting to be called on before asking a question
Example Definition: Replacement Behavior
When Aiden has a question, answer, comment, or needs teacher assistance during instruction, he will raise his hand and wait to be called on before speaking.
Examples
- When the teacher asks a question, raising his hand and waiting to be called on before answering
- When he has a question, raising his hand and waiting quietly until the teacher acknowledges him
- When wanting to share a comment, raising his hand and waiting for permission to speak
Non-Examples
- Raising his hand but speaking before the teacher calls on him
- He says, “I know!” or “Pick me!” without being called on
- He talks to a peer while waiting to be called on
Systematic Direct Observation (SDO)
For Your Information
- Although frequency and duration recording are considered the most accurate SDO methods, they might not be the most feasible in a typical classroom because they require an observer’s undivided attention.
- In a busy classroom, interval recording can be a more practical way to approximate the frequency or duration of a behavior. Interval recording is most accurate when intervals are short—typically 15 to 20 seconds and no longer than three minutes.
Educators can use a variety of methods to collect behavioral data in a systematic and consistent manner. One such method is systematic direct observation (SDO), which requires an observer to precisely measure how often a target or replacement behavior occurs or how long it lasts. Data can be captured using one of the following.
- Frequency or event recording—documents the number of times a behavior occurs within a given period (e.g., the number of times a student calls out during a one-hour lesson)
- Interval recording—documents whether a behavior occurred during brief periods or intervals (e.g., the number of one-minute intervals in which the student was out of their seat for any portion of time)
- Duration recording—documents how long a student engages in a behavior (e.g., time spent on task during independent work)
- Latency recording—documents the amount of time that elapses between when a direction or prompt is given and when the student begins the behavior (e.g., time between giving a student an assignment and the student beginning to work)
Note: Although educators can collect SDO data while teaching, doing so can be challenging and can interfere with instruction. Having a dedicated observer is recommended to capture the most accurate data.
Steps for Implementation
After identifying and operationally defining the behavior to be measured, use the steps below to collect SDO data.
- Choose the appropriate method: Select a recording method that is appropriate for the nature of the behavior being measured, as noted below. Inappropriate choices (e.g., using duration recording for short, frequent behaviors) can result in misrepresentation of behavior patterns and misleading data.
- Frequency or event recording—use for relatively brief behaviors with a clear beginning and end (e.g., shouting, hand raising, kicking)
- Interval recording—use for behaviors that occur frequently or continuously (e.g., off-task behavior, academic engagement) or for when it is not feasible to count or time every instance of the behavior
- Duration recording—use for sustained behaviors where the primary concern is the amount of time spent engaging in the behavior (e.g., crying episodes, attention to task, tantrums)
- Latency recording—use for capturing the time between an instruction being given and the behavior beginning or ending (e.g., delayed transitions, delayed response to directions)
- Create an observation schedule: Schedule observations during times when the behavior is expected to happen and for long enough to capture multiple instances of the behavior.
- Select or develop a recording form: Make sure the documentation system aligns with the method selected in Step 1. Data can be documented on paper forms, computerized systems, or mobile apps.
- Identify and train observer(s): One or more individuals (e.g., paraeducator, school psychologist) can conduct observations while the educator goes about usual instruction. Observers should be trained to understand the behavioral definition and the procedures for data collection.
- Conduct observations and record data: Using the observation schedule developed in Step 2, the observer watches the student and records instances of the defined behavior throughout the observation session.
- Organize the data: Organize in a way that supports interpretation and decision-making. For example:
- Numerical data from multiple days or weeks can be entered into a simple table or chart for comparison.
- Plotting the data on a line graph supports visual analysis of changes in the amount, severity, or consistency of the behavior over time.
Tips for Implementation
- To simplify the collection of data, try using one of these strategies:
- Frequency data—Make tally marks on paper, use a small handheld counter, or put a handful of small items (e.g., pennies, paper clips) in one pocket and move one item to the other pocket each time the behavior occurs.
- Interval data—Use a stopwatch, smartphone app, or vibrating wearable device to signal the end of an interval and prompt you to record data.
- Duration or latency data—Use a digital stopwatch to collect data in minutes and seconds; using a wall clock or wristwatch will not be as precise.
- Consider using technology tools (e.g., smartphone timer, mobile tally counter apps, web-based form-building tool) to make SDO data collection more feasible in a busy classroom.
- If you are unsure whether the behavior occurred (e.g., the student walks behind a bookshelf and cannot be seen), do not attempt to guess what happened. Document only what can be directly seen or heard.
- Add brief written notes about the nature of the observed behavior alongside the numerical data to provide additional description or context.
- Students sometimes behave differently if they know they are being observed or when a new person is in the classroom. To reduce this reactivity, try observing other students at the same time, integrating the observer into the classroom at other times, and using discreet recording methods.
- Calculate rates, percentages, or averages as appropriate to allow comparisons of data across observation periods of differing lengths. The chart below provides helpful calculations for each SDO method.
| Method | Calculation | Formula | Example |
| Frequency | Rate of the behavior | Rate = frequency count ÷ length of observation | 25 callouts ÷ 1.5 hours = 16.7 callouts per hour |
| Interval | Percentage of intervals in which the behavior occurred | Percentage = number of intervals with behavior ÷ total number of intervals x 100 | 42 intervals with off-task behavior ÷ 60 total intervals x 100 = 70% of intervals with behavior |
| Duration | Percentage of time engaged in the behavior | Percentage = minutes engaged in the behavior ÷ total minutes observed x 100 | 6 min out of seat ÷ 20 min observed x 100 = 30% of time engaged in target behavior |
| Duration | Average length of behavioral instances | Average = sum of lengths ÷ number of instances | (2.2 min + 6.1 min + 3.5 min + 5.0 min) ÷ 4 instances = average length of 4.2 min |
| Latency | Average elapsed time | Average = sum of latency lengths ÷ number of instances | (23 sec + 90 sec + 49 sec) ÷ 3 instances = average elapsed time of 54 sec |
Sample Recording Forms
Frequency/Event Recording Form
Directions: Make a mark each time the behavior occurs. To calculate rate, divide the total number of occurrences by the length of the observation.
Student: Shiloh
Date: 11/15/20XX
Class/Teacher: Reading/Mr. Morriggia
Observer: Mrs. Hale
Behavior: Any instance where Shiloh initiates physical contact with a peer’s body, hair, or clothing without explicit verbal or non-verbal invitation/consent from the peer.
| Start Time | End Time | Total Time | Tally | Total Occurrences | Rate |
| 9:00 a.m. | 9:15 a.m. | 15 min | 3 | 0.21/min or 1 every 5 min |
|
| 9:15 a.m. | 9:45 a.m. | 30 min | 5 | 0.2/min or 1 every 6 min |
|
| 10:05 a.m. | 10:35 a.m. | 30 min | 8 | 0.25/min or 1 almost every 4 min |
Interval Recording Form
Directions: Circle “+” for occurrence of behavior and “–” for nonoccurrence of behavior. Count the number of intervals during which the behavior occurred. Divide this number by the total number of intervals and multiply by 100 to determine the percentage of intervals during which the behavior occurred.
Student: Beckett
Date: 2/26/20XX
Class/Teacher: Social Studies/Mr. Vasquez
Observer: Mr. O’Brien
Start/End Times: 3:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Length of Interval: 1 min
Behavior: At any point during the interval, Beckett stands up, steps away, or moves out of a seated position at their assigned workspace without teacher permission or a transition cue.
| Interval | Behavior | Interval | Behavior |
| Example | 16 | + |
|
| 1 | + |
17 | + |
| 2 | 18 | + |
|
| 3 | + |
19 | + |
| 4 | + |
20 | |
| 5 | + |
21 | + |
| 6 | + |
22 | |
| 7 | 23 | ||
| 8 | 24 | + |
|
| 9 | 25 | + |
|
| 10 | + |
26 | |
| 11 | 27 | ||
| 12 | + |
28 | |
| 13 | + |
29 | |
| 14 | 30 | ||
| 15 | Total % | 50 % |
Additional Comments:
Duration Recording Form
Directions
- When the behavior begins, mark the start time.
- When the behavior ends, note the end time.
- Record the length of time that the behavior occurred.
- Repeat the above steps until the end of the observation period.
- Calculate the total duration by adding the duration of each episode during the observation period.
Student: Dakota
Date: 2/20/20XX
Class/Teacher: Language Arts/Ms. Ali
Observer: Dr. Crawford
Observation Period: 12:30 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Behavior: Any period where the student places their forehead, face, or head flat onto their desk or arms, disengaging from classroom activities.
| Start Time | End Time | Duration |
| 12:32 p.m. | 12:37 p.m. | 5 min |
| 12:59 p.m. | 1:08 p.m. | 9 min |
| 1:40 p.m. | 1:42 p.m. | 2 min |
| Total Duration | 16 min | |
Additional Comments:
Latency Recording Form
Directions
- Start the stopwatch when the prompt, directive, or instruction is provided.
- Stop the stopwatch when student complies.
- Record the number of seconds or minutes that elapsed between the end of the direction and the onset of the compliance.
- Repeat the above steps until the end of the observation period.
- Calculate the average latency of the behavior by dividing the total latency by the number of occurrences.
Student: Zuri
Date: 12/4/20XX
Class/Teacher: Geometry/Mr. Navarro
Observer: Mrs. Ellison
Behavior: Following a verbal or non-verbal teacher direction, Zuri initiates the first physical action required for the task (e.g., picking up a pencil, opening a book).
| Time of request or cue (start stopwatch) |
Time behavior was initiated (end stopwatch) |
Latency |
| 8:56:08 | 8:57:49 | 1 min, 41 sec |
| 9:11:37 | 9:14:12 | 2 min, 35 sec |
| 9:26:50 | 9:31:44 | 4 min, 54 sec |
| 9:43:26 | 9:44:02 | 36 sec |
| Total Average Latency | 2 min, 26.5 sec | |
Additional Comments:
For information about other data collection methods as well as graphing data, visit the following IRIS Case Study:
Alberto, P. A., Troutman, A. C., & Axe, J. B. (2022). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (10th ed.). Pearson.
Briesch, A. M., Volpe, R. J., & Floyd, R. G. (2018). School-based observation: A practical guide to assessing student behavior. Guilford Press.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Elswick, S., Casey, L. B., Zanskas, S., Black, T., & Schnell, R. (2016). Effective data collection modalities utilized in monitoring the good behavior game: Technology-based data collection versus hand collected data. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 158–169. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2015.07.059
Hill, E., Volpe, R. J., & Briesch, A. M. (2023). Psychometric properties of the classroom observation of engagement, disrespectful and disruptive behaviors. School Psychology Review, 52(6), 735–746. doi:10.1080/2372966X.2021.2001692
Hojnoski, R. L., Missall, K. N., & Wood, B. K. (2020). Measuring engagement in early education: Preliminary evidence for the behavioral observation of students in schools—Early education. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(4), 243–254. doi:10.1177/1534508418820125
Idaho Training Center. (n.d.). Behavior progress monitoring. https://idahotc.com/c/n/behaviorpm
Lane, J. D., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Using interval-based systems to measure behavior in early childhood special education and early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34(2), 83–93. doi:10.1177/0271121414524063
LeBlanc, L. A., Lund, C., Kooken, C., Lund, J. B., & Fisher, W. W. (2020). Procedures and accuracy of discontinuous measurement of problem behavior in common practice of applied behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 13(2), 411–420. doi:10.1007/s40617-019-00361-6
Ledford, J. R., Ayres, K. M., Lane, J. D., & Lam, M. F. (2015). Identifying issues and concerns with the use of interval-based systems in single case research using a pilot simulation study. Journal of Special Education, 49(2), 104–117. doi:10.1177/0022466915568975
Lewis, T. J., Scott, T. M., Wehby, J. H., & Wills, H. P. (2014). Direct observation of teacher and student behavior in school settings: Trends, issues and future directions. Behavioral Disorders, 39(4), 190–200. doi:10.1177/019874291303900404
Lohmann, M. J., Riggleman, S., & Higgins, J. P. (2024). Using a mobile device for early childhood classroom behavior data collection. Early Childhood Education, 52, 427–434. doi:10.1007/s10643-023-01443-5
Walker, J. D., & Barry, C. (2022). Behavior management: Systems, classrooms, and individuals. Plural Publishing.
Yoder, P. J., Ledford, J. R., Harbison, A. L., & Tapp, J. T. (2018). Partial-interval estimation of count: Uncorrected and Poisson-corrected error levels. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(1), 39–51. doi:10.1177/1053815117748407
Zakszeski, B. N., Hojnoski, R. L., & Wood, B. K. (2017). Considerations for time sampling interval durations in the measurement of young children’s classroom engagement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37(1), 42–53. doi:10.1177/0271121416659054