How can educators modify a student’s behavior?
Page 6: Antecedent-Based Interventions
Remember that the goal of antecedent-based interventions is to make the target behavior irrelevant by changing the environment. When educators proactively modify the context or events that commonly precede an interfering behavior (i.e., antecedents), it often becomes unnecessary for the student to engage in that behavior at all. Therefore, antecedent-based interventions are beneficial for students who exhibit a skill deficit or a performance deficit. Educators should carefully select antecedent-based interventions that align with the hypothesis statement developed from the FBA.
By adjusting the antecedents that trigger the target behavior, teams can purposefully choose a strategy that will reduce or remove them. Antecedents can be adjusted in many ways. Let’s explore six options that teams might consider when developing a student’s BIP.
Educators can consider simple changes to the classroom environment, such as:
- Changing the student’s seating location (e.g., closer to the teacher, away from distractions)
- Adjusting sensory stimulation (e.g., providing headphones, alternative seating options)
- Offering visual supports (e.g., schedules, picture cards, timers)
Environmental modifications can address different behaviors with different functions. For instance, reducing sensory stimulation can effectively prevent the need for a student to run from the classroom to escape a noisy environment. Alternatively, providing a visual schedule that clearly identifies when free time will occur could prevent the need for a student to act out to access a preferred activity.
Once a student can effectively demonstrate a replacement behavior, educators can use prompts to remind them to engage in it. Prompts often take the form of proactive reminders before the student is expected to demonstrate the replacement behavior, and they can be delivered through verbal statements, gestures, or visual supports. For example, before independent work, a teacher might prompt a student by pointing to a card or privately tell them, “Remember, you can show me your break card if you need a break.” As the student begins engaging in the replacement behavior more consistently, the educator can gradually fade prompts over time.
For Your Information
If a student’s interfering behavior is a reaction to academic difficulties, teams must ensure that they are receiving high-quality academic instruction and interventions (if appropriate) as well as behavioral support.
When a student engages in a target behavior to escape academic work, the team must try to identify why. For instance, do they find the work too challenging, too easy, overwhelming, or uninteresting? To address the underlying need, educators might consider adapting academic tasks by:
- Breaking larger assignments into smaller tasks
- Presenting only a few items (e.g., math problems, short-answer questions, pages of reading) at a time
- Providing extended time to complete a task
- Allowing alternate response modes (e.g., respond orally instead of in writing)
- Providing assistive technology (e.g., e-books, speech-to-text software, calculator)
x
speech-to-text
DEFINITION_DEFINITION_DEFINITION_DEFINITION
- Reading instructions and information aloud when the instructional goal is not reading related
- Offering enrichment or extension activities
- Integrating the student’s interests into the content
For Your Information
Educators can use the information gathered from student interviews during the FBA process to gain insight into the student’s interests and preferences, which can be used to offer more motivating and meaningful options.
Choice making is the process through which an educator provides structured options to facilitate a student’s ability to follow an instructional or behavioral request. Choice making is especially effective for students who engage in interfering behaviors to escape non-preferred or challenging tasks. Offering students choices gives them more control over their own learning and fosters independence. To avoid overloading the student, educators should limit the number of options (e.g., two or three). Educators may offer students choice in terms of:
- Materials (e.g., write in a journal or type on a computer)
- Environments (e.g., sit on the carpet or at a desk)
- Order of tasks (e.g., read a chapter and then do a worksheet, or vice versa)
- Activities (e.g., work on either math or writing during independent work time)
For more information on choice making, explore the IRIS Fundamental Skill Sheet:
Keep in Mind
If a student exhibits a skill deficit in self-regulation, the BIP team should plan and implement a teaching strategy to equip them with the skills needed to use a calming space effectively. For example, the student might need to be taught how to recognize when they are becoming frustrated or overstimulated, how to communicate their need for a break, or how to engage in self-regulation activities in the calming space.
Educators can support students’ self-regulation skills by creating a designated space in the classroom where individual students can go to take a short break or calm down. These areas are often referred to as calming spaces, cool-down areas, or peace corners. Students are taught to access and use the calming space as an appropriate alternative to interfering behaviors that serve the function of escape. For a calming space to be effective, though, the student must view the available items and activities as reinforcing. In this area, a student might:
self-regulation
DEFINITION_DEFINITION_DEFINITION_DEFINITION
- Spend a few quiet minutes with a comfort item or preferred activity
- Engage in sensory activities (e.g., listen to music, use a weighted blanket) or physical exercises (e.g., stretches, wall push-ups)
- Practice coping strategies (e.g., deep breathing, positive self-talk, mindfulness activities)
- Express themselves through writing or drawing
Using a calming space to take a short break should be a student’s voluntary decision. Although educators might suggest that a student consider taking a break, doing so should never be a disciplinary consequence. In this interview, Michael Bruebach discusses why it is important to establish expectations about the appropriate use of the cool-down corner (time: 1:48).
Transcript: Michael Bruebach
Making sure that our calm-down corner was being used the right way was a bit of an uphill battle for me at first because I always wanted to honor a student’s request when they were asking to use the calm-down space because one of their replacement behaviors was asking for a break. And so, I constantly wanted to honor those requests and reinforce those requests by giving them permission to use it. Once students found out they could use that to avoid work, once students were falling asleep in the calm down corner, or once students were requesting to doing their schoolwork in the calm down corner, I had to reevaluate my expectations and be more explicit and more precise about what the calm-down corner was for. And once I made those expectations clear with students and we agreed on some values—meaning the calm-down corner was a space for regulation—it was much easier to honor those requests when students were presenting signs of dysregulation. Because when I was unsure what I wanted the calm down corner to be for, it was drastically more difficult for them to understand because that was my job to set those expectations and to have those discussions about what our values were before so it was very clear what the calm-down corner was there for.
Noncontingent reinforcement is a strategy that involves delivering reinforcement on a regular schedule regardless of the student’s behavior. Because it is not dependent (i.e., contingent) on the student displaying any particular behavior, it is not designated as a reward to be earned. Rather than suggesting that “if you do X, then you get Y,” noncontingent reinforcement communicates that “you can count on Y being available at these scheduled times, no matter what.” As such, it allows the student to have their needs met without having to resort to the interfering behavior.
Although this strategy is often used to address behaviors for which attention is the function, it can also be used to address behaviors for which escape or access to items or activities is the function. Educators can use noncontingent reinforcement in a variety of ways, such as:
- Establishing designated times during the school day for the student to access attention by interacting with chosen teachers or other school staff (e.g., morning check-in, lunch meeting)
- Using a timer to remind themselves to provide the student with attention (e.g., give praise, stand near) on a regular schedule (e.g., every 10 minutes)
- Increasing opportunities for peer interaction throughout the school day
- Scheduling regular breaks from academic work
- Setting certain times when students can access reinforcing items or activities (e.g., computer, physical activity)
In this interview, Michael Bruebach explains how he implements noncontingent reinforcement in the classroom (time: 1:34).
Transcript: Michael Bruebach
One of the big values that I have is self-efficacy and kids know that reinforcement happens because of them and not to them. Noncontingent reinforcement was something that was kind of new to me and I had to adapt to because I always wanted to reinforce students for certain behaviors or reinforce when I saw them do something I wanted them to. And so, incorporating noncontingent, where every 10 minutes this buzzer would go off and I would go find this specific student and if their function was attention, just give them a little bit of attention. I’m not praising specifically for whatever desirable behavior I have in mind, but I’m just giving them that attention regardless. That took some time for me to grow accustomed to. I could very easily step away for five seconds every 10 minutes and just check in with the student, give my presence. Or if their function is avoidance, we could every 10 minutes give our friend a little break by having a conversation. It was fairly easy for me to incorporate once I had timers. That timer skill gave me a little bit of the structure that I needed to implement.
For Your Information
Antecedent-based interventions are designed to minimize immediate behavioral triggers within the school environment. However, some students’ behavior can also be influenced by setting events, like food or housing insecurity, sleep deprivation, or other outside circumstances. If such factors are identified, BIP teams should collaborate with relevant professionals (e.g., school counselor, social worker, school psychologist) to facilitate the student’s and family’s access to additional supports.
setting event
DEFINITION_DEFINITION_DEFINITION_DEFINITION
Returning to the Challenge
Because Tasha’s target behavior is triggered by the teacher instructing students to work independently on a written task (i.e., antecedent), the BIP team discusses potential modifications to these contexts. They decide to incorporate several antecedent-based interventions into her BIP:
- Adapt academic tasks: Allow alternatives to written responses (e.g., oral dictation, typing, demonstration) and provide written lists that break large assignments or tasks into smaller chunks.
- Provide space for self-regulation: Establish reset spaces in various locations where Tasha can take a break (e.g., music room, back table in the classroom, counseling office).
- Deliver prompts: Use non-verbal prompts (e.g., hand signal, sticky note) to remind Tasha of the option to request a break in the reset space before independent work begins.
Activity
In Isaiah’s case, the target behavior is usually preceded by a teacher verbally prompting students to transition away from an activity that he enjoys. In response, the BIP team decides to implement several antecedent-based interventions. For each antecedent adjustment below, select the best option for Isaiah.
|
The team also agrees to provide additional support on Mondays and the first day back to school following breaks, which were identified as setting events. On these days, Isaiah will start his morning with an additional five-minute check-in with the special education teacher to review his schedule, the expectations for transitioning, and how to use his communication card to request more time with an activity.