• IRIS Center
  • COVID-19 RESOURCES
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • IRIS Alignment Tools
      HLPs, SiMRs, & CEEDAR ICs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • For Faculty
      Sample syllabi, curriculum matrices, & more
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Independent Learners
      Resources & tools for independent learners
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • Micro-credentials
      Short. Focused. Intense.
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • Learner Outcomes
      Summaries of module effectiveness
    • Consumer Satisfaction
      Feedback and testimonials from IRIS users
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • About
    • Who We Are
      Our team, experts, & advisors
    • What We Do
      Our resources & process
    • Contact Us
      Get in touch with IRIS
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • AAA
  • Módulo
  • Reto
  • Pensamientos Iniciales
  • Perspectivas y Recursos
  • Resumen
  • Evaluación
Reto
Pensamientos Iniciales
Perspectivas y Recursos

¿En cuáles aspectos de la conducta de estos estudiantes piensa usted que la Srta. Rollison se debe enfocar?

  • Página 1: Introducción

¿A quién puede recurrir la Srta. Rollison por ayuda?

  • Página 2: Apoyo para la Srta. Rollison

¿Qué puede hacer la Srta. Rollison para fomentar la conformidad inicial a sus pedidos?

  • Página 3: Pedidos de alta probabilidad
  • Página 4: Tomar decisiones

¿Cuáles técnicas puede usar la Srta. Rollison para manejar las conductas perjudiciales y no conformistas de los estudiantes como Patrick y Tameka?

  • Página 5: Reforzamiento diferencial: Introducción
  • Página 6: Eliminar conductas usando Reforzamiento diferencial de otras conductas ("Differential Reinforcement of Other Behaviors" o "DRO")
  • Página 7: Reducir conductas usando Reforzamiento diferencial de tasas bajas de conducta ("Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates of Behavior" o "DRL")
  • Página 8: Sustituir conductas usando Reforzamiento diferencial de conducta incompatible ("Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior" o "DRI")

Recursos

  • Página 9: Referencias, Recursos e información adicional
  • Página 10: Créditos
Resumen
Evaluación
¡Queremos escuchar su opinión! Favor de completar nuestro breve formulario de retroalimentación.

Recursos

Página 9: Referencias, Recursos e información adicional

 

Para citar este módulo, favor de usar el siguiente formato:

The IRIS Center. (2005). Tratar las conductas perjudiciales y no conformistas (Parte 2). Accedido de https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/bi2-spanish/#content

Referencias

Artículos

Elliott, S., & Gresham, F. M. (1991). Social skills intervention guide. CirclePines, MN: American Guidance.

Recursos e información adicional

Artículos

Belfiore, P. J., Lee, D. L., Vargas, A. U., & Skinner, C. H. (1997). Effects of high-preference single-digit mathematics problem completion on multiple-digit mathematics problem performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, págs. 327–330. 

Cole, C. L., Davenport, T. A., Bambara, L. M., & Ager, C. L. (1997). Effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of students with behavior problems. Behavioral Disorders, 22, págs. 65–74. 

Cosden, M., Gannon, C., & Haring, T. G. (1995). Teacher-control versus student-control over choice of task and reinforcement for students with severe behavior problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, págs. 11–27.

Davis, C. A., Brady, M. P., Williams, R. E., & Hamilton, R. (1992). Effects of high-probability requests on the acquisition and generalization of responses to requests in young children with behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, págs. 905–916.

Davis, C. A., & Reichle, J. (1996). Variant and invariant high-probability requests: Increasing appropriate behaviors in children with emotional-behavioral disorders.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, págs. 471–482.

Davis, C. A., Reichle, J. E., & Southard, K. L. (2000). High-probability requests and a preferred item as a distractor: Increasing successful transitions in children with behavior problems. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, págs. 423–440.

Dunlap, G., de Perczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Wright, S., White, R., & Gomez, A. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and
behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, págs. 505–518.

Dyer, K., Dunlap, G., & Winterling, V. (1990). Effects of choice making on theserious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, págs. 515–524.

Guess, D., Benson, H. S., & Siegel-Causey, E. (1985). Concepts and issues relatedto choice-making and autonomy among persons with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, págs. 79–86.

Jolivette, K., Wehby, J. H., Canale, J., & Massey, N. G. (2001). Effects of choice making opportunities on the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, págs. 131–145.

Kern, L., Vorddran, C. M., Hilt, A., Ringdahl, J. E., Adelman, B. E., & Dunlap, G. (1998). Choice as an intervention to improve behavior: A review of the literature.

Killu, K. (1999). High-probability request research: Moving beyond compliance.Education and Treatment of Children, 22, págs. 470–494.

Lane, K. L., Pierson, M., & Givner, C. C. (2004). Secondary teachers’ views on social competence: Skills essential for success. Journal of Special Education. 38(3), págs. 174–186.

Lane, K. L., & Wehby, J. (2002). Addressing antisocial behavior in the schools: A call for action. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 6, págs. 4–9.

Mace, F. C., & Belfiore, P. (1990). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of escape-motivated stereotypy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, págs. 507–514.

Mace, F. C., Hock, M. L., Lalli, J. S., West, B. J., Belfiore, P., Pinter, E., & Brown, D. K. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, págs. 123–141.

Moes, D. R. (1998). Integrating choice-making opportunities within teacher-assigned academic tasks to facilitate the performance of children with autism. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, págs. 183–193.

Ogier, R. E., & Hornby, G. (1996). Effects of differential reinforcement on the behavior and self-esteem of children with emotional and behavioral disorders.
Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, págs. 501–510.

Ramasamy, R., Taylor, R. L., & Ziegler, E. W. (1996). Eliminating inappropriate classroom behavior using a DRO schedule: A preliminary study. Psychological
Reports, 78,págs. 753–754.

Repp, A. C., & Deitz, S. M. (1974). Reducing aggressive and self-injurious behavior of institutionalized retarded children through reinforcement of other behaviors.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, págs. 313–325.

Repp, A. C., Deitz, S. M., & Speir, N. C. (1974). Reducing stereotypic responding of retarded persons by the differential reinforcement of other behavior. American
Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, págs. 279–284.

Repp, A. C., Barton, L. E., & Brulle, A. R. (1983). A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors. Journal of
Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, págs. 435–445.

Repp, A. C., Felce, D., Barton, L. E. (1991). The effects of initial interval size on the efficacy of DRO schedules of reinforcement. Exceptional Children, 57, págs. 417–425.

Wehby, J. H., & Hollahan, M. S. (2000). Effects of high-probability requests on the latency to initiate academic tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33,
págs. 259–262.

Wehby, J., Symonds, F., Canale, J., & Go, F. (1998). Teaching practices in classrooms for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Discrepancies
between recommendations and observations. Behavior Disorders, 24, págs. 51–56.

Capítulos de libros

Colvin, G. (2002). Designing classroom organization and structure. In K.L. Lane, F. M. Gresham, & T. E. O’Shaughnessy (Eds.), Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (págs. 159–174). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Gresham, F.M. (2002). Social skills assessment and instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. In K. L. Lane, F. M. Gresham, and T. E. O’Shaughnessy (Eds.), Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (págs. 242–258). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Lane, K. L. (2004). Academic instruction and tutoring interventions for students with emotional/ behavioral disorders 1990 to Present. In R. B. Rutherford, M. M. Quinn, and. S. R. Mathur (Eds.), Handbook of research in behavior disorders. New York: Guilford Press.

Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. (2002). Developmental prevention of at-risk outcomesfor vulnerable antisocial children and youth. In K. L. Lane, F. M. Gresham, & T. E.
O’Shaughnessy (Eds.), Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (págs. 177–194). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon

Libros

Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (1999). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, Nk Merrill/ Prentice Hall.

Carr, E. G., Levin, L., McConnachie, G., Carlson, J. I., Kemp, D. C., & Smith, C. E. (1994). Communication-based intervention for problem behavior. Baltimore:
Paul H. Brookes.

Colvin, G. (1993). Managing acting-out behavior. Eugene, OR: Behavior Associates.

Lane, K. L., Gresham, F. M., & O’Shaughnessy, T. E. (2004.), Interventions for children with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Lane, K. L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. E. (2004). School-based interventions: The tools you need to succeed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Maag, J. W. (2004). Behavior management: From theoretical implications to practicalapplications (2a ed.), págs. 151–197. USA: Wadsworth.

Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1991). Behavior analysis for lasting change.Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Walker, H. M., Colvin, G., & Ramsey, E. (1995). Antisocial behavior in school:Strategies and best practices. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole.

Walker, H. M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in schoolwith infotrac: Evidence-based practices (with InfoTrac). USA: Wadsworth.

 
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Atrás Próximo
12345678910
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Our Values
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 iris@vanderbilt.edu. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E170001. The contents of this Website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Sarah Allen.

Copyright 2021 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College