• IRIS Center
  • COVID-19 RESOURCES
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • IRIS Alignment Tools
      HLPs, SiMRs, & CEEDAR ICs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • For Faculty
      Sample syllabi, curriculum matrices, & more
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Independent Learners
      Resources & tools for independent learners
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • Micro-credentials
      Short. Focused. Intense.
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • Learner Outcomes
      Summaries of module effectiveness
    • Consumer Satisfaction
      Feedback and testimonials from IRIS users
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • About
    • Who We Are
      Our team, experts, & advisors
    • What We Do
      Our resources & process
    • Contact Us
      Get in touch with IRIS
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • AAA
  • Module
  • Challenge
  • Initial Thoughts
  • Perspectives & Resources
  • Wrap Up
  • Assessment
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What aspects of these students' behaviors do you think Ms. Rollison should focus on?

  • Page 1: Introduction

Who can Ms. Rollison go to for help?

  • Page 2: Support for Ms. Rollison

What can Ms. Rollison do to encourage initial compliance to her requests?

  • Page 3: High Probability Requests
  • Page 4: Choice Making

What techniques can Ms. Rollison use to manage the disruptive and non-compliant behaviors of students like Patrick and Tameka?

  • Page 5: Differential Reinforcement: Introduction
  • Page 6: Eliminating Behaviors Using Differential Reinforcement of Other Behaviors (DRO)
  • Page 7: Reducing Behaviors Using Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates of Behavior (DRL)
  • Page 8: Substituting Behaviors Using Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior (DRI)

Resources

  • Page 9: References Additional Resources
  • Page 10: Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
We want to hear from you. Please complete our brief Module Feedback Form.

What techniques can Ms. Rollison use to manage the disruptive and non-compliant behaviors of students like Patrick and Tameka?

Page 8: Substituting Behaviors Using Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior (DRI)

students workingOne way to address a problem behavior is to substitute and then reinforce another behavior.

Differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior (DRI) is a procedure in which the teacher would identify a behavior that’s incompatible with, or cannot occur at the same time as, the problem behavior. The focus is on replacing negative behaviors with positive behaviors. For example, a student cannot at the same time:

  • Sit in a desk and wander around the classroom
  • Be verbally aggressive toward a peer and give that peer a compliment

In these instances, sitting at the desk and complimenting a peer are examples of positive, incompatible behaviors that can replace the inappropriate behaviors of wandering around the classroom or being verbally aggressive.

Differential Reinforcement
Type Abbr. How/When To Use Main Goal
Differential reinforcement of incompatible behavior DRI

Reinforce the student when s/he engages in an identified behavior which is incompatible with the target behavior.

Example: Student receives a sticker for each interval he is on task vs. daydreaming at his desk.

SUBSTITUTE
a behavior

A DRI procedure allows the teacher to identify a pro-social or appropriate behavior in which the student should be engaging and also prevents the student from engaging in a problem behavior identified by the teacher as troublesome. DRI delivers reinforcement to that positive, incompatible behavior.

Listen now as Joe Wehby explains the advantages of DRI and how to use it in the classroom. You may find it helpful to follow along in the “Steps for Using DRI” box below as you listen to the audio.

Joe Wehby
Joe Wehby, PhD
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN

DRI Advantages

(time: 0:38)
/wp-content/uploads/module_media/bi2_media/audio/bi2_Wehby5a_pg08.mp3

View Transcript


DRI Steps

(time: 1:14)
/wp-content/uploads/module_media/bi2_media/audio/bi2_Wehby5b_pg08.mp3

View Transcript

Transcript: Joe Wehby, PhD

A DRI strategy should be chosen carefully because it does require a little more effort than the other differential reinforcement procedures in the sense that you have to identify behaviors that are actually incompatible, and sometimes that’s not as easy as it seems. But once that is done, it does have the advantage over a differential reinforcement of low rate behavior (DRL) or the differential reinforcement of other behaviors (DRO) procedures in that you’re identifying a specific behavior in which you are trying to reinforce. And that should be a pro-social behavior that student should be engaging in at a level that’s similar to peers in his classroom or children of his or her age.

Transcript: Joe Wehby, PhD

Implementation of these steps is as follows:

  1. The teacher identifies the problem behavior that is occurring at a fairly frequent rate.
  2. Once that behavior has been identified, the teacher would then brainstorm, possibly with the student, alternatives to that behavior that would prevent that student from engaging in that particular behavior. We’ll use the simple example of out-of-seat and in-seat.
  3. Once that incompatible behavior has been identified, then the teacher would arrange reinforcement strategies to deliver to the student when he is engaging in the incompatible behavior. That might be verbal praise, simple acknowledgement; it might be the delivery of a sticker, a checkmark on a good behavior chart, some acknowledgement that that student has engaged in the appropriate social behavior.
  4. If the student happens to engage in an inappropriate behavior, then the student would either be ignored or some sort of reprimand or other consequence would be delivered so the student would learn that the positive acknowledgement from teachers occur during modeling or demonstration of the appropriate behavior, but there is some consequence for engaging in inappropriate behavior as well.

Steps for Using DRI

  1. Identify a problem behavior that is occurring at a fairly frequent rate and collect baseline data if necessary.
  2. Brainstorm alternative (incompatible) behaviors that would keep the student from engaging in the problem behavior.
  3. Determine and deliver reinforcement when the student is engaging in the alternate/ incompatible behavior.
  4. Deliver appropriate consequence if the student engages in negative behavior.

As they develop this procedure, teachers may want to take note of the types of reinforcement the student inadvertently receives by engaging in the problem behavior. For example, a student who acts out and gets sent out of class is reinforced by not having to complete his or her work. A student who clowns around and jokes in class is reinforced with the attention of peers. Once a teacher recognizes other sources of reinforcement, these sources can be decreased or eliminated and replaced with reinforcement for the positive, incompatible behavior.

In this audio, Joe Wehby explains what outcomes teachers can expect when using a DRI procedure (time: 0:31)

Joe Wehby

Joe Wehby, PhD
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN

/wp-content/uploads/module_media/bi2_media/audio/bi2_Wehby5c_pg08.mp3

View Transcript

Transcript: Joe Wehby, PhD

Over time, if the reinforcers are identified and delivered appropriately and consistently, then you should see sort of an increase in the appropriate behavior during those times and a decrease in the inappropriate behavior to a level that would be acceptable to that particular classroom teacher. A DRI is not going to eliminate all occurrences of problem behavior but should result in the student engaging in more positive than more negative behavior.

Using DRI with Patrick

Patrick

Now that she has helped Patrick reduce both his rude comments and calling-out behaviors, Ms. Rollison decides that she wants to focus on his out-of-seat behavior. With Ms. Thibodeaux’s help, Ms. Rollison works through the following DRI steps:

  1. Identify a problem behavior that is occurring at a fairly frequent rate and collect baseline data if necessary.
    Out-of-seat behavior, occurs every six to seven minutes
  2. Brainstorm alternative (incompatible) behaviors that will keep the student from engaging in the problem behavior.
    Working quietly at his desk
  3. Determine and deliver reinforcement when the student is engaging in the alternate/ incompatible behavior.
    The smiles and head nods, similar to the other DR procedures, checkmark on chart for every eight minutes he can stay in his seat. Then increase that to 10, 14, 18, etc. When Patrick can maintain that level of on-task behavior for three days in a row, he has chosen to work for a longer-term reinforcer of free time again, but this time would like to have the free time with a friend.
  4. Deliver appropriate consequence if the student engages in negative behavior.
    Head shake, reminder to remain in his seat, no checkmarks on chart

Click the audio icon for some additional thoughts from Ms. Thibodeaux regarding this DRI procedure for Patrick (time: 0:52).

helen

Ms. Thibodeaux

/wp-content/uploads/module_media/bi2_media/audio/bi2_BI5d_pg08.mp3

View Transcript

Transcript: Ms. Thibodeaux

It’s physically impossible for Patrick to be wandering around the classroom at the same time that he is sitting in his seat, so Ms. Rollison chose a good incompatible behavior. She also chose to have him working quietly at his desk, which is even better. This added component of his incompatible behavior—the working quietly—also produces some positive outcomes in the form of his academic work.

I think it’s interesting that Patrick has changed his long-term reinforcer this time to free time with a friend. Because he’s no longer making rude comments and talking out, he is probably getting more positive feedback from his peers. This in turn provides more encouragement for him to engage in appropriate behaviors.

 

 

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
12345678910
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Our Values
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 iris@vanderbilt.edu. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E170001. The contents of this Website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Sarah Allen.

Copyright 2021 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College