Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Page 3: Intensifying and Individualizing Interventions
  • IRIS Center
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Faculty
      Top tips, coursework planning, & more
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • IRIS Archived Resources
      Modules, alignment tools, & more
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • IRIS+ School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • Intensive Intervention (Part 1): Using Data-Based Individualization To Intensify Instruction
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What is data-based individualization?

  • 1: Overview of Intensive Intervention
  • 2: Data-Based Individualization

How can school personnel intensify and individualize instruction?

  • 3: Intensifying and Individualizing Interventions
  • 4: Change Intervention Dosage and Time
  • 5: Change the Learning Environment
  • 6: Teach Cognitive Processing Strategies
  • 7: Modify Delivery of Instruction
  • 8: Implementation Considerations
  • 9: Making Instructional Decisions for Reading
  • 10: Making Instructional Decisions for Mathematics

Resources

  • 11: References, Additional Resources, and Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
Provide Feedback

How can school personnel intensify and individualize instruction?

Page 3: Intensifying and Individualizing Interventions

There are two steps in the DBI process at which point teachers can intensify and individualize instructional interventions, Step 1 and Step 4. Read more about them below.

  • Step 1: Validated Intervention Program—Teachers should intensify the secondary intervention by making quantitative changes (e.g., increase amount of instructional time, decrease group size).
  • Step 2: Progress Monitoring*
  • Step 3: Diagnostic Assessment*
  • Step 4: Intervention Adaptation—Following progress monitoring and a diagnostic assessment, teachers can adapt the intervention by making quantitative and/or qualitative changes (e.g., the way in which content is delivered).
  • Step 5: Progress Monitoring*

vip_graphic_faded

Description of DBI Steps Graphic

This graphic illustrates both the steps of data-based individualization, as well as they ways in which those steps interact. Step 1, “Validated Intervention Program,” is represented by an orange rectangle. This box connects via a vertical grey line to Step 2, “Progress Monitoring,” which is illustrated as a green oval. Both steps, in turn, are connected to a horizontal line with labeled circles at each of its ends. The circle on the left, “Nonresponsive,” has a red minus sign at its center, while the circle on the right, “Responsive,” has a red plus sign. A grey arrow connected to the “Nonresponsive” circle points toward Step 3 of the DBI process, “Diagnostic Academic Assessment/Functional Assessment,” which is represented as a green oval, similar to Step 2. The “Responsive” circle also has a grey arrow, this one pointing back up toward Step 2, “Progress Monitoring.”

Step 3 is connected via a vertical grey arrow to Step 4, “Intervention Adaptation,” represented as an orange rectangle. Another grey arrow connects Step 4 to Step 5, “Progress Monitoring,” another green oval. As above, these latter steps are connected to a horizontal line with labeled circles at each of its ends. The circle on the left, “Nonresponsive,” has a red minus sign at its center, while the circle on the right, “Responsive,” has a red plus sign. A large grey arrow connected to the “Nonresponsive” circle points back to Step 3, “Diagnostic Academic Assessment/Functional Assessment,” while the “Responsive” circle directs instructors back to Step 5, “Progress Monitoring.”

This module page focuses on Steps 1 and 4, so those orange boxes are highlighted whereas the rest of the graphic is slightly faded out.

*Note: This module, part one of a series, focuses on the intervention aspects of DBI—Step 1 and Step 4—covered in more detail on the following pages. You can learn about the data components of DBI—Step 2, Step 3, and Step 5—by viewing the second IRIS Module in this series: Intensive Intervention (Part 2): Collecting and Analyzing Data for Data-Based Individualization.

As the graphic below illustrates, there are four main ways to intensify or individualize an instructional intervention, ranging from the least intensive to the most intensive. The first two methods—”change dosage or time” and “change the learning environment”—are quantitative changes to instruction. These types of adaptations are recommended for Step 1 of the DBI process and can also be used in Step 4. The other two methods of adapting instruction—”combine cognitive processing strategies with academic learning” and “modify delivery of instruction”—are qualitative changes to instruction that are typically used in Step 4. To meet a student’s needs, the teacher might choose to use a combination of quantitative and qualitative adaptations in Step 4 based on the results of a diagnostic assessment in Step 3.

qualitative and quantitative comparison
Vaughn, et al., 2013

Description

This graphic represents the four main ways to intensify or individualize an instructional intervention, ranging from the least intensive to the most intensive. There are two quantitative changes and two qualitative ones, all represented as overlapping circles. Increasing intensification is represented by darkening colors; the circles start off light pink on the left and turn orange at the right. The first quantitative change is “Change Dosage or Time.” This circle overlaps with “Change the Learning Environment To Promote Attention and Engagement,” which in turn overlaps with the first qualitative change, “Combine Cognitive Processing Strategies with Academic Learning.” The final circle is labeled “Modify Delivery of Instruction.”

Further information about each of the four methods of instructional adaptation highlighted above can be found on the subsequent pages. As you view these pages, you might find it helpful to use the advance organizer offered by the National Center on Intensive Intervention.

Intensive Intervention Practice Categories Checklist

For Your Information

In the case of students receiving special education services, an IEP team meeting—a meeting of relevant individuals who collectively make decisions regarding the education of a student with disabilities—is required before instructional adaptations can be made.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
12345678...11
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Careers at IRIS
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected]. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Anna Macedonia.

Copyright 2025 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok