Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Page 10: Making Instructional Decisions for Mathematics
  • IRIS Center
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Faculty
      Top tips, coursework planning, & more
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • IRIS Archived Resources
      Modules, alignment tools, & more
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • IRIS+ School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • Intensive Intervention (Part 1): Using Data-Based Individualization To Intensify Instruction
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What is data-based individualization?

  • 1: Overview of Intensive Intervention
  • 2: Data-Based Individualization

How can school personnel intensify and individualize instruction?

  • 3: Intensifying and Individualizing Interventions
  • 4: Change Intervention Dosage and Time
  • 5: Change the Learning Environment
  • 6: Teach Cognitive Processing Strategies
  • 7: Modify Delivery of Instruction
  • 8: Implementation Considerations
  • 9: Making Instructional Decisions for Reading
  • 10: Making Instructional Decisions for Mathematics

Resources

  • 11: References, Additional Resources, and Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
Provide Feedback

How can school personnel intensify and individualize instruction?

Page 10: Making Instructional Decisions for Mathematics

teacher observing students workingCole is a second-grade student who has persistent difficulties in mathematics. Although Cole seems to have a good understanding of basic mathematics facts, he has difficulty with subtracting multi-digit numbers. Therefore, he received targeted instruction (Tier 2 instruction):

  • In a small group of 4 children
  • In a heterogeneous group
  • For 2 times per week
  • For 15 minutes per session
  • For 8 weeks
  • Using a validated mathematics program

After eight weeks of targeted instruction, Cole’s weekly progress monitoring data indicate that he is not making adequate progress. Consequently, the student support team decides it is time to implement DBI.

Keep in Mind

Some of the information on this page mirrors that provided on the “Making Data-Based Instructional Decisions for Mathematics” page of the IRIS Module Intensive Intervention (Part 2): Collecting and Analyzing Data for Data-Based Individualization, which focuses on Steps 2, 3, and 5 of the DBI process.

Begin the DBI Process

Step 1: Validated Intervention Program

The student support team decides to make quantitative changes to the validated program used during targeted instruction and to implement it for six weeks. The adapted intervention will be delivered:

  • In a small group of 3 students
  • In a homogenous group
  • For 3 times per week
  • For 20 minutes per session

Steps 1 to 5 of the DBI process.

Activity

Compare the instruction that Cole received in targeted instruction to that he will receive once the DBI process begins. How much more instructional time will Cole receive once he begins intensive intervention?

Click here for feedback.

Cole will receive one extra session/week, and the length of the sessions will increase from 15 minutes to 20 minutes. Therefore, the amount of instructional time will increase from 30 minutes to 60 minutes per week. In other words, Cole will receive twice as much instructional intervention once the DBI process begins.

Step 2: Progress Monitoring

After making these quantitative changes, Cole’s teacher continues to monitor his progress (Step 2) for five weeks. Although Cole’s progress monitoring scores are improving, they are not improving enough for him to reach his year-end goal. Because of this, Cole seems to need additional intervention adaptations to support his learning needs.

Coles progress monitoring graph

Description

This graph displays Cole’s progress monitoring data over a span of thirteen weeks, which here form the x-axis and which is divided by a vertical blue dotted line after week eight and a half. The left side of this line is labeled “Tier 2,” whereas the section after the line is labeled “Quantitative Changes.”

The y-axis is labeled “Number Correct” and is divided into five-point increments from 0 to 35. Cole’s goal line is represented by a red line that begins just below 15 correct responses and ends at 20 correct responses.

Cole’s actual correct responses are represented by a blue line that indicates the following numbers: 10, 11, 13, 10, 14, 15, 13, 15, 16, 17, 17, 19, and 20. At all points, Cole’s progress is beneath his goal line.

Keep in Mind

Steps 2, 3, and 5 related to data collection and analysis are explained in detail in the IRIS Module:

  • Intensive Intervention (Part 2): Collecting and Analyzing Data for Data-Based Individualization

Step 3: Diagnostic Assessment

Because the data suggest that Cole is not making sufficient progress, his teacher conducts an informal diagnostic assessment, which includes an error analysis of one of Cole’s worksheets. Informal diagnostic assessments help determine what specific skills the student is struggling with. The data indicate that Cole is having difficulty with subtraction. He seems to always subtract the lesser number from the greater number, regardless of whether the lesser number is on the top (minuend) or the bottom (subtrahend). As part of the diagnostic assessment, the student support team reviewed Cole’s graphed progress monitoring data. They noted that Cole’s progress monitoring scores fall below the goal line.

x

error analysis

The process of reviewing error patterns in work samples or assessments (e.g., progress monitoring measure, phonics inventory) to identify a student’s skill deficits.

Step 4: Instructional Adaptation

The student support team reconvened to examine Cole’s progress monitoring and diagnostic assessment data to make a decision regarding instructional adaptations that will likely help Cole make adequate progress. Because his progress monitoring scores are approaching the goal line, they think that more focused instruction on his specific skill deficit will be more beneficial than increasing the amount of intervention he receives. Cole’s support team recommends the following qualitative instructional adaptations:

  • Explicit instruction on regrouping
  • Self-instruction

Activity

Review the two adaptations recommended for Cole in Step 4. Explain how each of the two adaptations will address Cole’s learning needs.

Click here for feedback.

The two adaptations will address Cole’s learning needs in the following ways.

  • Explicit instruction: By using explicit instruction, Cole’s teacher can teach him how to perform the correct operation for subtracting greater numbers from lesser numbers in a structured manner, as well as model this skill. The teacher can then guide Cole through this process and provide corrective feedback.
  • Self-instruction: This strategy will help Cole talk himself through the steps of the correct mathematical operation. He can also use this strategy to check his answers.

Step 5: Progress Monitoring

Progress monitoring data were collected for another six weeks. The data indicate that Cole is making adequate progress and will meet his end-of-year goals. Because of his progress, the student support team decides to continue implementing the current intervention and monitor his progress.

Coles progress monitoring graph

Description

This graph displays Cole’s progress monitoring data over a span of nineteen weeks, which here form the x-axis and which is divided by a vertical blue dotted line after week eight and a half. The left side of this line is labeled “Tier 2,” whereas the section after the line is labeled “Quantitative Changes.” At week thirteen and a half, another vertical dotted line divides the graph. From that point until week 19, the graph is labeled “Quantitative and Qualitative Changes.”

The y-axis is labeled “Number Correct” and is divided into five-point increments from 0 to 35. Cole’s goal line is represented by a red line that begins just below 15 correct responses and ends at 20 correct responses.

Cole’s actual correct responses are represented by a blue line that indicates the following numbers: 10, 11, 13, 10, 14, 15, 13, 15, 16, 17, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, and 29. At all points, Cole’s progress is beneath his goal line.

Keep in Mind

Although Cole made adequate progress with the current intervention, some students with severe and persistent learning difficulties might need to repeat the last three steps of the DBI process (i.e., diagnostic assessment, intervention adaptation, progress monitoring) multiple times to reach the level of intensity and individualization required for the student to make adequate progress.

Steps 3 to 5 of the DBI process.

Summary

Although Cole has learned how to regroup when subtracting a greater from a lesser number, the teacher must continue to collect progress monitoring data to assess his performance on an ongoing basis. By collecting data, the teacher can make sure that Cole continues to apply this skill consistently and that he is not struggling with other skills.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
1...4567891011
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Careers at IRIS
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected]. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Anna Macedonia.

Copyright 2025 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok