Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Page 7: Tier 2 Components
  • IRIS Center
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Faculty
      Top tips, coursework planning, & more
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • IRIS Archived Resources
      Modules, alignment tools, & more
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • IRIS+ School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • RTI (Part 2): Assessment
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What is RTI?

  • 1: A Quick Overview of RTI

How will teachers initially identify struggling readers?

  • 2: Universal Screening Components
  • 3: Identification of Struggling Readers
  • 4: Tier 1 Components
  • 5: The Tier 1 Decision-Making Process
  • 6: Identifying Students Who Do Not Show Adequate Progress in Tier 1

How will teachers determine which students need more intensive instruction?

  • 7: Tier 2 Components
  • 8: Identifying Students Who Do Not Show Adequate Progress in Tier 2
  • 9: Tier 3 Components
  • 10: Assessment in Tier 3

Resources

  • 11: References, Additional Resources, and Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
Provide Feedback

How will teachers determine which students need more intensive instruction?

Page 7: Tier 2 Components

Students who require Tier 2 intervention are those who did not respond adequately to the high-quality instruction provided in the general education classroom (i.e., Tier 1). This tier of RTI usually involves more intensive targeted intervention and frequent monitoring.

Targeted Intervention

rti02_07_a_tchrshowingbookTargeted intervention involves providing a standard, validated instructional program to students in a group typically consisting of no more than five students. This intervention should be provided by someone who has received extensive training in the intervention program and may be implemented by general education teachers, paraprofessionals, reading specialists, or other qualified individuals. No matter who delivers Tier 2 intervention, the general education teacher should share responsibility for the instructional planning and the decision-making process for these students.

For more information on Tier 2 reading instruction, view the IRIS Module:

  • RTI (Part 3): Reading Instruction

Frequent Monitoring

The individual providing Tier 2 instruction needs to continue to monitor student progress. The procedures and measures used for progress monitoring in Tier 2 are the same as those used in Tier 1. This phase of intervention should be provided for a minimum of 10 weeks, during which it is recommended that the Tier 2 instructor continue to plot each student’s scores on his or her existing progress monitoring graph. The instructor should draw a dotted vertical line to indicate when Tier 2 intervention begins. This will allow school personnel to compare the progress made during the different tiers of intervention. Click here to see an example of a graph containing both Tier 1 and Tier 2 interventions.

LaToya’s CBM Graph

Example of a graph that contains both Tier 1 and Tier 2 intervention

graph with tier 1 and tier 2

This graph shows LaToya’s Tier 1 and Tier 2 data. The dotted vertical line indicates when Tier 2 intervention begins. It is common practice to draw a dotted vertical line on a graph to indicate the point at which instruction or intervention changes.

RTI Tier Decision Process

In addition to the two methods of evaluating student progress discussed in the Tier 1 section (i.e., performance level, rate of growth), a third method can be used to evaluate student progress. This method consists of using performance level and rate of growth in conjunction and is the preferred means for determining whether students are responding adequately to Tier 2 intervention. Research demonstrates that using both criteria provides a better picture of how students are responding to Tier 2 intervention than does either criterion alone.

x

dual discrepancy approach

The use of twin criteria, performance level and rate of growth, to evaluate student progress.

Research Shows

  • The use of both criteria, performance level and rate of growth, was shown to be the most reliable means of distinguishing between students who respond to instruction and those who do not.
    (McMaster, Fuchs, Fuchs & Compton, 2002)
  • Unlike the IQ-achievement discrepancy model, the use of both criteria (performance level and rate of growth) to determine academic progress avoids gender bias or the overrepresentation of specific ethnic groups in special education services.
    (Speece, 2005)

rti02_07_b_twostudentsTo assess progress, teachers need to examine students’ CBM data at the end of the predetermined Tier 2 monitoring period (a recommended minimum of 10 weeks). Teachers will examine both performance level and rate of growth for only the Tier 2 portion of the graph and will decide whether students are making progress based on the following guidelines:

  • Students are making adequate progress if their scores are at or above the established criterion for either performance level or rate of growth
  • Students are not making adequate progress if their scores fall below the criteria for both performance level and rate of growth

The table below summarizes this decision making process.

Performance Level Rate of Growth Outcome
Meets
Criteria
Yes Yes Making adequate progress
Yes No Making adequate progress
No Yes Making adequate progress
No No Not making adequate progress; needs more intensive services

It is important to note that there is no set sequence for the evaluation of performance level and rate of growth. For the purposes of this module, an order has been imposed on this process (see steps below) because experience indicates that it is more common for students to meet their performance-level expectations (i.e., benchmark) than to meet their rate-of-growth expectations (i.e., slopes). In effect, evaluating performance level may first reduce the amount of work teachers have to do to make tier decisions.

As they evaluate how their students respond to Tier 2 intervention, teachers should do the following:

Step 1: Evaluate the performance level for each struggling student.

  • If a student’s performance level meets or exceeds the relevant benchmark smallstop
  • If a student’s performance level does not meet the benchmark go go to Step 2

Step 2: Evaluate the rate of growth.

  • If a student’s slope meets or exceeds the established rate of growth smallstop
  • If a student’s slope does not meet the established rate of growth go provide Tier 3 intensive, individualized instruction

In Summary

decision tree

If the student’s performance level is equal to or greater than the established benchmark or if the student’s rate of growth (slope) is equal to or greater than the specified rate of growth (e.g., 1.8 on the first-grade Vanderbilt University WIF probe), the student is responding adequately to instruction.

On the other hand, if the student’s performance level and rate of growth are less than the specified criteria, more intensive instruction is warranted.

Description of RTI Decision Process graphic

Universal Screening: Did this student demonstrate adequate reading performance on the screening? If not, monitor Tier 1 progress.

Assessing Tier 1 Response: Is this student responding adequately to general education classroom instruction? If not, implement Tier 2 intervention.

Assessing Tier 2 Response: Is this student responding adequately to targeted intervention? If not, implement Tier 3 intervention.

For Your Information

Communicating with Students

When they view their academic growth in an easily understood format (e.g., on a graph), students can see the relationship between their effort and their progress. Graphs:

  • Offer students a visual representation of their progress
  • Demonstrate that hard work pays off
  • Motivate students to maintain their efforts or to work harder

Communicating with Parents

CBM data are an excellent resource to use when communicating student progress to parents. During a parent-teacher meeting, teachers can clearly demonstrate:

  • How the student is progressing compared to his or her past achievement
  • What goals the student is expected to meet by the end of the school year

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
1...4567891011
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Careers at IRIS
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected]. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Anna Macedonia.

Copyright 2025 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok