Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Wrap Up
  • IRIS Center
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Faculty
      Top tips, coursework planning, & more
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • IRIS Archived Resources
      Modules, alignment tools, & more
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • IRIS+ School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • RTI (Part 2): Assessment
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What is RTI?

  • 1: A Quick Overview of RTI

How will teachers initially identify struggling readers?

  • 2: Universal Screening Components
  • 3: Identification of Struggling Readers
  • 4: Tier 1 Components
  • 5: The Tier 1 Decision-Making Process
  • 6: Identifying Students Who Do Not Show Adequate Progress in Tier 1

How will teachers determine which students need more intensive instruction?

  • 7: Tier 2 Components
  • 8: Identifying Students Who Do Not Show Adequate Progress in Tier 2
  • 9: Tier 3 Components
  • 10: Assessment in Tier 3

Resources

  • 11: References, Additional Resources, and Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
Provide Feedback

RTI (Part 2): Assessment

Wrap Up

In general, RTI serves two primary purposes:

teacher with students reading

  • It allows for early intervening—the identification of struggling students before they fall too far behind their peers—as well as the provision of several levels of instruction to meet their needs.
  • It facilitates the identification of students who may have learning disabilities.

More specifically, RTI assessment procedures:

  • Identify students who may struggle academically by administering the universal screening
  • Document students’ progress by collecting progress monitoring data
  • Determine the adequacy of each student’s response to instruction in order to decide on the appropriate level of instructional intensity (i.e., tier decision) by evaluating the progress monitoring data
  • Guide instruction by utilizing the progress monitoring data

The figure below outlines the RTI assessment procedures for each tier and provides a review of the RTI decision process.

decisionTreeUniversal Screening:

  • ALL students are assessed.
  • Struggling students are identified.

Tier 1:

  • All students receive high-quality instruction.
  • The progress of struggling students’ is monitored for 5–10 weeks.
  • Students who do not respond adequately to Tier 1 instruction are identified.

Tier 2:

  • Students receive targeted intervention for a minimum of 10 weeks.
  • The progress of these students’ is monitored during this intervention.
  • Students who do not respond adequately to Tier 2 intervention are identified.

Tier 3:

Students receive more intensive intervention through either:

  • General education
  • Special education

Description of RTI Decision Process graphic

Universal Screening: Did this student demonstrate adequate reading performance on the screening? If not, monitor Tier 1 progress.

Assessing Tier 1 Response: Is this student responding adequately to general education classroom instruction? If not, receive Tier 2 intervention.

Assessing Tier 2 Response: Is this student responding adequately to targeted intervention? If not, receive Tier 3 intervention.

Although the assessment procedures for RTI may seem overwhelming, listen as Candy Justa, a kindergarten teacher, describes how easy it is to implement progress monitoring in the classroom (time: 0:24).

Candy Justa
Kindergarten teacher, Popham Elementary School
Del Valle, Texas

/wp-content/uploads/module_media/rti02_assessment_media/audio/rti02_wrap_audio_justa.mp3
Transcript

candy justa

Transcript: Candy Justa

For both the student and the teacher, it is simple. It is a simple assessment. It takes one minute. It doesn’t take very much time. I just think it’s just so simple and quick. You just have to have that mindset: I am going to make time for this. This is what’s most important. It’s important for the child and their parent. This is something I could just whip out no matter what time, what day of the week the parent comes in.

Revisiting Initial Thoughts

Think back to your initial responses to the following questions. After working through the resources in this Module, do you agree with your Initial Thoughts? If not, what aspects of your answers would you change?

What is RTI?

How will teachers initially identify struggling readers?

How will teachers determine which students need more intensive instruction?

When you are ready, proceed to the Assessment section.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Careers at IRIS
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected]. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Anna Macedonia.

Copyright 2025 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College