• IRIS Center
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • IRIS Alignment Tools
      HLPs, SiMRs, & CEEDAR ICs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • For Faculty
      Sample syllabi, curriculum matrices, & more
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Independent Learners
      Resources & tools for independent learners
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Teachers
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • Micro-credentials
      Short. Focused. Intense.
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • Learner Outcomes
      Summaries of module effectiveness
    • Consumer Satisfaction
      Feedback and testimonials from IRIS users
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • About
    • Who We Are
      Our team, experts, & advisors
    • What We Do
      Our resources & process
    • Contact Us
      Get in touch with IRIS
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • AAA
  • Module
  • Challenge
  • Initial Thoughts
  • Perspectives & Resources
  • Wrap Up
  • Assessment
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

How can Mr. Brewster and the other school professionals at Rosa Parks Elementary School prepare to implement RTI?

  • Page 1: Preliminary and Ongoing Professional Development
  • Page 2: Before School Starts
  • Page 3: Once School Starts

How can the Rosa Parks teachers effectively implement the RTI components in each tier?

  • Page 4: Universal Screening
  • Page 5: Tier 1
  • Page 6: Tier 2
  • Page 7: Tier 3

What other considerations should Mr. Brewster and the other school professionals be aware of when implementing RTI?

  • Page 8: Initiating and Discontinuing Intervention
  • Page 9: Addressing Diversity
  • Page 10: Communicating with Students, School Personnel, and Parents
  • Page 11: Troubleshooting

Resources

  • Page 12: References & Additional Resources
  • Page 13: Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
We want to hear from you. Please complete our brief Module Feedback Form.

How can the Rosa Parks teachers effectively implement the RTI components in each tier?

Page 4: Universal Screening

As he begins Tier 1 instruction, Mr. Brewster will administer the universal screening measure. He will then use the data to:

  • Verify whether students should remain in the existing small groups or determine whether the groups need to be restructured
  • Identify students who are potentially struggling with reading and who need to be monitored frequently to determine if intervention would be beneficial

Administering the Universal Screening Assessment

one on one student with teacherTeachers should schedule the administration of the universal screening assessment to fit their schedules and their classrooms’ needs. The S-Team and the principal at Rosa Parks have decided that all universal screenings should be completed by mid-September (i.e., two weeks after school begins), so Mr. Brewster chooses to conduct the screenings during the last 10 minutes of reading class while his students are engaged in independent practice. By screening four to five students a day, he anticipates that he can easily assess all 24 by the end of the second week, if not earlier.

paper, pencil, and calclator Although the first-grade teachers at Rosa Parks are using a Dolch sight word list for the universal screening, the second-grade teachers are using a one-minute reading (curriculum-based measurement) probe. They have chosen to use a different measure for two primary reasons. First, research indicates that while the Dolch sight word list may be sufficient and even superior to other assessments for identifying potentially struggling first-grade students, the data also indicate that an assessment using curriculum-based measurement (CBM) is better at identifying struggling second-grade students. In addition, the second-grade teachers had planned to use CBM Passage Reading Fluency (PRF) probes for their weekly progress monitoring data collection and thought it would be easier and more convenient to use the same materials for both assessments (i.e., universal screening and progress monitoring).

LouisaFor a demonstration of how to administer PRF as the universal screening assessment, click on the portrait of Louisa to the left.

Now that Mr. Brewster has completed the universal screening with all of his students, he is ready to restructure his small groups. Because his original grouping was based on last year’s assessment data, Mr. Brewster only has to make a few changes to his original group assignments. In addition, he will begin collecting progress monitoring data for those students who scored in the bottom 25 percent of the class on the screening—the criteria determined by Rosa Parks school personnel to identify students as potential struggling readers.

Grouping

rti04_04_c_teacherandpapersOnce Mr. Brewster has collected the universal screening data for each of his students, he rank-orders the scores so that he can determine how best to group his students. Mr. Brewster can go about this in a variety of ways, including same-ability grouping and mixed-ability grouping. Mr. Brewster decides that by grouping the students according to ability level (same-ability grouping), he can more effectively differentiate instruction and, as a result, better address each student’s instructional needs. After carefully reviewing the scores, he divides the students into three groups based on performance level: low, middle, and high.

Below are the universal screening results for the students in Mr. Brewster’s class. The color-coding differentiates the three groups and will be used to represent the three performance levels for the remainder of this page and on the next.

First Name Fall Universal
Screening Scores (PRF)
Jack * 5
Laney * 7
Adam * 8
Sammy * 9
Paloma * 10
LaToya * 11
Caleb 19
Jenny 28
DeJuan 29
Casey 31
Susie 32
Niklas 35
Harris 35
Teri 36
Leoni 38
Irina 40
Jaye 41
Caroline 43
John 49
Misty 53
Benika 65
Hannah 71
Twyla 104
Alfredo 126

* Students who scored in the bottom 25 percent of the class on the universal screening measure must have their progress monitored.

 
bracket
bracket
bracket
 
Group 1: Low Performing Readers - Jack, Laney, Adam, Sammy, Paloma, LaToya.
Group 2: Middle Performing Readers -  Calem, Jenny, Dejuan, Casey, Susie, Niklas, Harris, Teri, Leoni, Irina, Jaye, Caroline.
Group 3: High Performing Readers - John, Misty, Benika, Hannah, Twyla, Alfredo.

As depicted in the table above, Mr. Brewster’s middle-performing group is the largest, with 12 students, whereas each of the other two groups contain six students. It is usually a good idea to limit the number of students in the low-performing group to five or six. The three groups are represented by the tables above.

Activity

Review your initial groupings for Mr. Brewster’s class on Perspectives and Resources Page 3. Compare how you grouped Mr. Brewster’s students to how Mr. Brewster grouped them following the universal screening. Discuss the similarities and differences of your initial student grouping and Mr. Brewster’s.

Keep in Mind

During the school year, Mr. Brewster can continually reorganize these small groups as students’ reading skills improve or as students begin to struggle. For example, Caroline’s scores on the universal screening initially led Mr. Brewster to place her in the middle-performing group; however, after several weeks of observing Caroline during small-group instruction, it becomes apparent that she would benefit more from the instruction provided in the high-performing group.

rti04_04_d_sixkids

Identifying Potential Struggling Students

Those students who scored in the bottom 25 percent of the class on the universal screening assessment (the criteria determined by Rosa Parks school personnel to identify students as potential struggling readers) are noted by asterisks in the table above. They are Jack, Laney, Paloma, Sammy, Adam, and LaToya. Mr. Brewster will monitor all of these students, except for Jack (see box below for more information), for the next eight weeks.

Jack’s Story

JackAs Mr. Brewster learns from viewing the students’ files from previous years, Jack was identified as having a learning disability in first grade and his individualized education program (IEP) was developed at this time. He has been receiving special education (Tier 3) services ever since. Because he has an existing IEP, Jack has already begun Tier 3 intervention this year with the special education teacher, Ms. Jacobs. She will collect progress monitoring data on him and will discuss the results with Mr. Brewster on a regular basis. For this reason, Mr. Brewster will not collect progress monitoring data on Jack during Tier 1 instruction.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
12345678...13
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 iris@vanderbilt.edu. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E170001. The contents of this Website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Sarah Allen.

Copyright 2019 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College
We use cookies to ensure that your visit to our Website is the best it can be. By using the IRIS Website, you consent to our use of cookies.Ok