Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Page 1: Person-Centered Transition Planning
  • IRIS Center
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
    • For PD Providers
      Learning pathways, PD facilitation toolkit, & more
    • For Faculty
      Tips for using IRIS resources, coursework planning forms, & more
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • IRIS Archived Resources
      Modules, alignment tools, & more
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • For PD Providers
      Learning pathways, PD facilitation toolkit, & more
    • IRIS+ School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
  • Reports
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • Secondary Transition: Person-Centered Transition Planning
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What is person-centered transition planning?

  • 1: Person-Centered Transition Planning
  • 2: Self-Determination

How can students be actively engaged in transition planning?

  • 3: Student Involvement in the IEP Process
  • 4: Transition Assessments and Postsecondary Goals
  • 5: Student Leadership in IEP Meetings
  • 6: Monitoring Progress toward Goals

How can educators facilitate person-centered transition planning?

  • 7: Supporting the IEP Team
  • 8: Implementation Considerations

Resources

  • 9: References, Additional Resources, and Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
Provide Feedback

What is person-centered transition planning?

Page 1: Person-Centered Transition Planning

Planning for life after high school can be both exciting and overwhelming. This is a time of major transition when important decisions about a student’s future education, employment, and independence are made. Now imagine this process playing out without the student’s input or involvement. Picture a group of educators and family members coming together to choose a student’s high school classes, summer job, and future college, all without ever asking the student what they want. Would the choices align with the student’s personal goals and aspirations? And how might the student feel about having such important life decisions made for them?

x

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)

glossary

x

transition planning

glossary

x

multidisciplinary team

glossary

For Your Information

The IEP is developed by a multidisciplinary team of education professionals, the student’s parents, and the student (when appropriate). This team meets at least once a year to review the student’s progress. The student must be invited to attend any IEP meeting in which transition planning will be discussed.

At a federal level, IDEA mandates that transition planning must be documented in a student’s IEP by the time they turn 16. However, about half of all states require transition planning to begin earlier, often by age 13 or 14. IEP teams typically start considering transition near the end of middle school as a student begins planning their high school course of study.

Unfortunately, this scenario has historically been the reality for many students with disabilities. Although the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires educational planning as well as transition planning for students with disabilities, students themselves are not always meaningfully involved in these processes.

Educational planning includes the development of an individualized education program (IEP)—a document outlining the student’s annual learning goals and objectives, as well as the supports and services required to achieve those goals. For older students (i.e., 16 years old or earlier if required by their state), transition planning involves developing an additional component of the IEP called an Individualized Transition Plan (ITP). This plan outlines:

x

Individualized Transition Plan (ITP)

glossary

  • Postsecondary goals—long-term, measurable goals that the student will achieve after high school in three areas:
    • Education and training
    • Employment
    • Community engagement and independent living (if needed)
  • Transition services—a course of study and specific activities that assist the student in learning the necessary knowledge and skills to reach their postsecondary goals
  • Annual goals—goals in academic and functional skill areas that support the implementation of transition services and allow the student to make progress toward meeting their postsecondary goals
x

course of study

glossary

x

functional skills

glossary

Because transitions are so personal and individualized, student voice is essential for success. Educators can increase students’ involvement by implementing person-centered planning, sometimes referred to as student-centered planning or student-focused planning. In this process, students are actively engaged in developing, communicating, and evaluating their progress toward meeting meaningful postsecondary goals. When planning is person centered, the IEP team prioritizes student input and works to make collective decisions that reflect the student’s best interests.

Joy Ivester, from the Transition Alliance, discusses the importance of involving students in the transition planning process. Then, Bettie Ray Butler shares more about student voice and taking an asset-based approach to transition planning.

Joy Ivester

Joy Godshall Ivester, MEd
Program Director, Transition Alliance of South Carolina
University of South Carolina Center for Disability Services

(time: 1:21)

Transcript

Bettie Ray Butler, PhD
Professor of Urban Education
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Content Specialist, NTACT:C

(time: 3:01)

Transcript

Transcript: Joy Godshall Ivester, MEd

Student centered means local practitioners value the student voice and the student’s going to be front and center in their own planning process. Individuals with disabilities should be involved in all aspects of policies, programs, and services related to the disability community. So we think that any time a group of professionals are sitting around a table planning for a student, the student should be there taking the pilot’s seat in the process. With getting students more involved in leading their IEPs, there’s nothing more critical than starting early. Students in the elementary grades should be involved in the transition planning process, taught about the IEPs and their purpose of planning. How can we justify planning for a student without having them in the driver’s seat? Ultimately, you have to ask the question, Would you want someone else planning your life for you? With regard to stakeholders and getting them on board, you have to start early. So it’s not an initiative or a program or something that you’re trying or working on students with beginning at age 14 or 16. We should expect all students to begin participating and gradually taking on that leadership role early in their educational careers. And for older youth and young adults, collaborative planning and training is critical so that everyone is speaking the same language and holding the high expectations for all students.

Transcript: Bettie Ray Butler, PhD

It’s important to start with the student voice to understand their goals and to make sure that their goals are a part of the transition planning process because sometimes what the student wants is very different than what their parents want for them. And oftentimes, they feel ignored in the transition process. Being participatory in the process, being asked, “What do you want? What are your goals? What excites you about employment? What excites you about your educational plans? What excites you about living independently?” It’s leaning into what the student desires that makes them feel seen and heard and that highlight their visibility. It’s important to also make sure that the transition team does not participate in deficit thinking. And to do this, we have to focus on the assets that the students—as well as the families and the parents—bring to the transition team and to incorporate that expertise in the planning process as well. And this helps us to focus more on ability. What is the capacity of the student to achieve and meet these goals? So we must approach transition planning meetings as a team from a very asset-based perspective. It is unfortunate that sometimes educators cannot necessarily see the promise and potential of the students. And they may have assumptions about the family, maybe having a lack of awareness about the youth and their background. The communities that they come from may be perceived from a very deficit lens. And so making sure that that does not find itself into these transition planning meetings. It’s important to always make sure that the team itself collectively sees the potential of the youth and makes sure that they hold the youth to high expectation. For example, a student wants to open their own business. There should not be a deviation from helping that student to open their own business following graduation, to maybe encouraging them to go into a more hospitality-based career. And so it’s important to, again, maintain those high expectations, not to water down what the youth suggests that they need or what they desire or want based on what educators believe the student or youth is capable of doing.

Returning to the Challenge

Recall from the Challenge that Mr. Longoria wants to facilitate person-centered planning for Nia and Jeremy but questions how he can do so. Keeping their needs and future goals in mind, each student’s IEP team must collaboratively prioritize the meaningful involvement and input of Nia and Jeremy in their own transition planning processes.


Nia

Grade: 11th
Disability: Dyslexia and speech impairment
Future Goals: Attend college; career in fashion design

 


Jeremy

Grade: 9th
Disability: Intellectual disability
Future Goals: Work with animals; live independently

x

dyslexia

glossary

x

speech or language impairment

glossary

x

intellectual disability

glossary

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
123456789
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Careers at IRIS
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected]. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Anna Macedonia.

Copyright 2026 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.