• IRIS Center
COVID-19 RESOURCES
Careers at IRIS
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • IRIS Alignment Tools
      HLPs, SiMRs, & CEEDAR ICs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • For Faculty
      Sample syllabi, curriculum matrices, & more
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Independent Learners
      Resources & tools for independent learners
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • Learner Outcomes
      Summaries of module effectiveness
    • Consumer Satisfaction
      Feedback and testimonials from IRIS users
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • About
    • Who We Are
      Our team, experts, & advisors
    • What We Do
      Our resources & process
    • Contact Us
      Get in touch with IRIS
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • Module
  • Challenge
  • Initial Thoughts
  • Perspectives & Resources
  • Wrap Up
  • Assessment
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What is differentiated instruction?

  • Page 1: Defining Differentiated Instruction
  • Page 2: General Principles

How do teachers differentiate instruction?

  • Page 3: Know Your Students
  • Page 4: Differentiate Instructional Elements
  • Page 5: Differentiate Content
  • Page 6: Differentiate Process
  • Page 7: Differentiate Product
  • Page 8: Evaluate and Grade Student Performance

How do teachers prepare their students and their classrooms for differentiated instruction?

  • Page 9: Communicate with Students and Parents
  • Page 10: Organize the Classroom
  • Page 11: Employ Effective Behavior Management

What does differentiated instruction look like in the classroom?

  • Page 12: Classroom Implementation

Resources

  • Page 13: References & Additional Resources
  • Page 14: Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
We want to hear from you. Please complete our brief Module Feedback Form.

How do teachers differentiate instruction?

Page 7: Differentiate Product

di_page07_01

When teachers differentiate product, they assess the same concept or skill for each student at the end of a unit of study; however, teachers offer their students a variety of ways to demonstrate their knowledge (e.g., video, written report). When doing so, the teacher strives to:

  • Make the product assignment challenging but not so difficult or complex that the students are unable to complete it on their own.
  • Provide clear directions.
  • Create a task that reflects real-world application.

Teachers should also include visual, auditory, and kinesthetic (i.e., involving movement or hands-on activities) options as well as analytic, creative, and practical ones. They might also allow the students to complete the product alone or as a group. Although teachers typically allow students to choose the type of product they complete, they need to make clear that their students cannot always choose to complete the same type of product assignment. The table below highlights a few strategies for differentiating product. Click on each link to learn detailed information about implementing these strategies.

Strategy Readiness Interest Learning Profile
Tiered Products readiness bullet
Tic Tac Toe readiness bullet interest bullet learning profile bullet
Learning Menus readiness bullet interest bullet learning profile bullet
RAFT readiness bullet interest bullet learning profile bullet

Tiered Products

Keep in Mind

To design and match the product assignments to the students’ readiness levels, teachers should refer to the pre-assessment and ongoing assessments results.
As activities can be tiered to differentiate the learning process, so too can products be tiered to differentiate how students demonstrate their learning. When teachers assess students’ knowledge in this way, they design a range of products that are challenging for students at different levels of readiness (in general low, middle, and high groups).

The example below illustrates the use of tiered products. By being aware of her students’ readiness levels, the teacher has developed a different assignment for each level of learner: Group 1, below grade-level learners; Group 2, grade-level learners; and Group 3, above grade-level learners.

Language Arts-Fifth Grade

Key Concept: Make and Revise Predictions.
Lesson: Students have been reading a novel, The Witch of Blackbird Pond by Elizabeth George Speare. They have just finished the first chapter and will make predictions based on the events that have transpired. Their predictions will come in written form and will be turned in at the end of class.

Group 1 Group 2 Group 3
These students need to understand the events of the first chapter of the novel. They will have read the chapter but will answer questions given to them to check on their comprehension of the facts of the chapter first. After understanding the facts, they will write a letter from Kit to her friend in Barbados telling what she expects will happen next. The letter needs to be turned in at the end of the class. These students will analyze the events in chapter one. They will analyze according to Kit’s thoughts concerning her “disappointment in America.” They will focus on analysis of why America would be disappointing to a person who was coming from Barbados. Do a prewriting exercise of creating a Venn diagram that shows a comparison of America (as Kit sees it) and Barbados (as Kit remembers it). Then use your information to write a journal entry from Kit’s point of view that explains why she is so disappointed and predicts what she thinks will happen next. Turn in your journal entry at the end of the class. These students will synthesize the words used in chapter one according to what the words help them learn about Kit. They will then predict what will happen next from a synthesis of the words used to tell the events in the first chapter. Important words to present to them to begin their search are embarrassment (p.6), dour-looking (p.7), impulsively (p.8), Heathen Island (p.11), Puritans (p.12), humiliation (p.13), respectable woman (p. 13), and nonchalance (p. 14). If they do not know word meanings, they should begin their search in a dictionary. Then they should write Kit’s explanation (in any form they choose) of what has happened and what she predicts next. Turn in the piece at the end of class.

Adapted from http://www.doe.in.gov/exceptional/gt/tiered_curriculum/languagearts/la5r.htm

Tic Tac Toe

tick tack toe grid

Tic-tac-toe, sometimes referred to as Think-tac-toe, is a method of offering students choices in the type of products they complete to demonstrate their knowledge. As in a traditional tic-tac-toe game, students are presented with a nine-cell table of options. The teacher should make sure that all options address the key concept or skill being learned. There are several variations on this method:
  • Students choose three product options that form a horizontal, vertical, or diagonal line.
  • Students choose one product choice from each row or from each column (without forming a straight line).
  • The teacher can create two or more versions to address the different readiness levels.

In the example below, a high-school teacher creates a Tic-tac-toe assignment for a unit on Romeo and Juliet. The teacher wants the students to complete assignments for three categories: characters, setting, and theme. Notice that the teacher creates three assignments for each of these categories, resulting in a total of nine tasks from which students can choose.

Example

Directions: Complete one activity from each row.

Characters Write an essay comparing and contrasting yourself to one of the major characters. Create a list of at least five interview questions to ask Romeo or Juliet about what the reader should learn from their experiences. Create an audio including the questions and answers. Now that you’ve read Romeo and Juliet and watched Westside Story, create a play that contains these two major characters and is set in modern times.
Setting Choose your favorite scene and describe how the setting affects the mood of the play. Choose your favorite scene and create a detailed scaled model of it. Choose your favorite scene and write an essay describing the differences in the settings of Romeo and Juliet and Westside Story.
Theme List five well-known quotes from the play. List the character who said the quote and describe how each quote relates to a major theme of the play. Create a table that compares and contrasts the Montagues and Capulets with the Hatfields and McCoys. Create a video trailer for a new version of the movie Romeo and Juliet.

Learning Menus

When teachers use learning menus, or choice boards, they offer students four to six options for producing a final product. Each choice should be challenging and should require approximately the same amount of time to complete. Below are some examples of product choices that teachers can include in a menu.

Examples of Product Choices
  • Video
  • Poster
  • Web page
  • Mock trial
  • Letter to the editor
  • Exhibit
  • News report
  • Written report
  • Diorama
  • Skit
  • Puppet show
  • Map
  • Demonstration
  • Photo essay
  • Play
  • Creative writing project
  • Travel brochure
  • Song
  • Poem
  • PowerPoint presentation
  • Debate
  • Reenactment
  • Diagram
  • Advertising campaign

Although there are a number of ways to offer these choices, some teachers present them as a dinner menu. For this method, students often select one “entree” task and two “side-dish” tasks. Additionally, students may elect to complete a “dessert” task for enrichment. Below is an example of one such dinner menu.

The School Diner – Idioms

appetizer, soup

Appetizer (You must do this)
  • With a partner, select one idiom from the bulletin board. Discuss what you think the idiom means. Then look up the idiom in the book In a Pickle: And Other Funny Idioms, Scholastic Dictionary of Idioms, or Super Silly Sayings That Are Over Your Head: A Children’s Illustrated Book of Idioms. You can find copies in the class library.

appetizer, soup

Entrees (You must do all)
  • Read one of the following books provided by the teacher:
    • Any Amelia Bedelia book
    • Butterflies in My Stomach and Other School Hazards
    • Reach for the Stars and Other Advice for Life’s Journey
    • You Are What You Eat and Other Mealtime Hazards
  • Make a list of all of the idioms in the book and write their meaning.

appetizer, soup

Side Dishes (Select at least two)
  • Write an idiom you have heard used in your life and explain what it means. Draw a picture of what the main character of the story you read might do if he or she heard it.
  • Select an idiom from the bulletin board or one that you have heard used and add it to the story you read. Write at least 6 sentences.
  • With a partner, create a short skit using an idiom from the bulletin board or one that you have heard used.

appetizer, soup

Dessert (Optional)
  • Learn more about idioms from other cultures.
    • Read I’m Not Hanging Noodles on Your Ears and Other Intriguing Idioms From Around the World
    • Use the bookmarks on the computer to visit several Websites that illustrate idioms from other cultures.

RAFT

raft stands for role, audience, format, and topicTeachers can offer students product choices by using a RAFT (role, audience, format, topic). Each column specifies the role the student will adopt, the audience he will address, the format of the work, and the topic to be addressed. Sometimes, students are asked to choose a row, and sometimes they are asked to make a selection from each column. In other instances, the teacher may assign students a row that matches their readiness levels. Typically, RAFTs can be completed in a relatively short amount of time and can be assigned as classwork or homework.

Example

A fourth-grade social studies class is studying the colonization of America. The teacher creates the following RAFT for this unit.

Role Audience Format Topic Profile
Pilgrim relatives in England letter the first winter
Myles Standish male pilgrims old enough to defend the colony map of settlement defending the settlement
John Carver future generations diary establishing and maintaining law and order
Squanto other members of his tribe oral report of observations (audio recording) settlers (physical characteristics, ways of life, daily routines)
Journalist newspaper subscriber newspaper article the landing of the Mayflower

Tip

Teachers often find Bloom’s taxonomy helpful when differentiating product based on student readiness.

Click here to view the entire taxonomy (original and revised) and a list of actions that students perform at each level.

Bloom’s taxonomy identifies six levels of learning, from the most basic (i.e., recalling facts) to the most complex (i.e., evaluating information). For instance, when she creates a tiered assignment, the teacher often develops three levels of activities. For the lowest level, she might develop activities that assess students’ knowledge and comprehension; for the middle group, she might assess their ability to apply and analyze information; for the high group, she might require them to synthesize and evaluate the information. The tables below present the hierarchy of six levels of learning. For each level of learning, the table provides verbs teachers often use when designing product assignments or test questions.

Bloom’s Taxonomy (original*)
Knowledge identify, list, arrange, define, describe, label, match, order
Comprehension classify, summarize, predict, locate, discuss
Application compute, demonstrate, show, solve, write
Analysis compare, contrast, experiment, model, separate
Synthesis arrange, combine, formulate, revise, propose
Evaluation argue, defend, justify, appraise

*Published in 1956.

Bloom’s Taxonomy (revised**)
Remembering identify, list
Understanding categorize, summarize, compare, explain, give examples, predict
Applying perform lab test, solve a math problem, write an essay using correct grammar and punctuation
Analyzing differentiate, draw conclusions, organize
Evaluating determine, judge, critique, test
Creating generate, plan, construct, design

**Drafted in 1999 in response to new evidence about students’ development and educational practices.


For Your Information

Differentiating product contrasts with how teachers in a traditional classroom typically assess their students’ knowledge—administering a written test at the end of a unit of study. Teachers in a traditional classroom often assume that a written test is an accurate indication of what their students have learned. However, issues such as a student’s ability to read and comprehend text sometimes interfere with accurately assessing what the student knows. Although they should continue to administer written tests, teachers should redesign or build their tests so that they are differentiated.

Building Differentiated Tests

When they create written tests to use in a differentiated classroom, teachers should keep a number of factors in mind:

  • Using a variety of question types. In addition to using traditional question types (see table below), teachers should include nontraditional question types such as analogies, demonstrations, drawings, and real-world applications. This allows teachers to determine which students have mastered the content or skill. Different students perform better on certain types of question types than on others, so having a variety of question types maximizes the probability that each student will have the opportunity to demonstrate his or her knowledge. Teachers should also use a combination of forced-choice items (e.g., matching, multiple choice) and constructed response items (e.g., create a timeline, write a short essay).
    Traditional Question Types Considerations and Suggestions
    Multiple choice
    • Write in simple language and use as few words as possible.
    • Avoid negatives (e.g., Which of these is not an example of an insect?).
    • Make sure the construction of the stem or answers does not give the answer away (e.g., The stem ends with “an” and only one answer begins with a vowel).
    Matching
    • Write the definitions on the left and list the words on the right so that students read a definition and then scan the list of words instead of vice versa.
    • Keep all matching items on the same page.
    • Include no more than eight items.
    • Note: This type of question is good for struggling readers because it requires minimal reading.
    Sentence completions and fill-in-the-blanks
    • Provide answer blanks and adequate space for written responses.
    • Understand that students’ handwriting is often difficult to decipher.
    • Write sentences so that the blanks are near the end to minimize issues with reading comprehension.
    Labeling diagrams, charts, and maps
    • Provide adequate space for the students to label.
    • Understand that students’ handwriting is often difficult to decipher.
    Ordering items or events
    • Note: This type of question works well for literature, history, science, and math.
    Short answers or essays
    • Grade only the content being tested and not the students’ writing skills (e.g., grammar, punctuation); an exception is the spelling of content area vocabulary.
    • Allow students to convey their knowledge in the most efficient manner (e.g., bulleted items, diagrams). Requiring them to write complete sentences may impede their ability to fully demonstrate their knowledge.
    True/ False
    • Teachers may want to avoid true/ false questions because they often involve the use of negatives, which are difficult for many students (e.g., Plants do not need sunlight to produce chlorophyll). Additionally, this test format is typically a difficult one for struggling readers and for students who experience test anxiety.
    • Provide a “T” and “F” for true/ false questions for the student to circle. This avoids the misinterpretation of a student’s illegible written T’s and F’s. It also prevents students with handwriting challenges from tiring during the tests when they are required to write out “true” and “false.”
  • Preteaching test-related vocabulary. Teachers should preteach unfamiliar words or phrases included in test items such as “compare” or “contrast.”
  • Making the format efficient for students. This allows students to demonstrate their knowledge without having to spend time and energy navigating the layout of the test.
  • Highlighting key words. When words such as four, most, least, and excluding are highlighted, students are less likely to forget the criteria while formulating their answers.
  • Making test items straightforward. The test items should assess the students’ knowledge of the content or skill. Items that include negatives or require overly complicated logic interfere with students’ ability to accurately demonstrate their knowledge.
  • Specifying the criteria for constructed response items. Items that require the students to formulate responses (e.g., essays, short answers) should specify the criteria (e.g., length of essay, number of examples).
  • Using authentic assessment. Test students in the same way they were taught. For example, if students have been working on the addition of two-digit numbers using only computation problems, the test should not include word problems.

Adapted in part from Fair Isn’t Always Equal: Assessing & Grading in the Differentiated Classroom, by R. Wormeli, 2006.

Teachers are sometimes concerned that if they allow their students to demonstrate their knowledge in ways other than written tests, these students will not be prepared to take standardized tests. Carol Ann Tomlinson discusses why this is not the case (time: 0:49).

Carol Ann Tomlinson, EdD
Professor of Educational Leadership, Foundations, and Policy
The University of Virginia
Charlottesville, VA

/wp-content/uploads/module_media/di_media/audio/di_audio_page_07_tomlinson.mp3

View Transcript

hs_tomlinson

Transcript: Carol Ann Tomlinson, EdD

A lot of times, teachers will feel like the standardized test is not going to be differentiated, so I can’t differentiate now because they won’t be prepared for that test. Teaching is not the test. The test is one moment in a time. You can give kids hints on how to take tests. They can take a couple of dry runs. But to teach them in ways that are ineffective for nine months before the test comes is not likely to benefit them much. What some research suggests to us is that kids do better on standardized tests when the teaching-learning process is a fit for them, even if the standardized test is not in their preferred way of learning. And probably the two reasons for that is that they learn more on the way to the test, and they also develop more confidence as a learner.

 

 

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
1...5678910...14
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Our Values
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected] The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this Website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Sarah Allen.

Copyright 2023 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College