Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Page 7: The Rosa Parks RTI Framework
  • IRIS Center
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities,
      & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice
      Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with
      disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with
      disabilities
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms,
      & more
    • For Faculty
      Top tips, coursework planning,
      & more
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website
      & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • IRIS Archived Resources
      Modules, alignment tools,
      & more
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • IRIS+ School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • About
    • Who We Are
      Our team & IRIS Ambassadors
    • What We Do
      Our resources & process
    • Contact Us
      Get in touch with IRIS
    • Careers at IRIS
      Join our team
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • RTI (Part 1): An Overview
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What procedures do you think Rosa Parks Elementary is using to provide services to struggling students? Why are school personnel dissatisfied with this process? (Opinion Question: No Resources)

What approaches are available to schools to help struggling readers and to efficiently identify students who need special education services?

  • 1: Struggling Readers
  • 2: The IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model
  • 3: The Response-to-Intervention Approach (RTI)

What other information might a school find helpful when choosing which approach to adopt?

  • 4: The Rationale for RTI: Early Intervening and Identification of Learning Disabilities
  • 5: Approaches to RTI

What steps might the S-Team propose to help its struggling readers?

  • 6: Steps to This RTI Approach
  • 7: The Rosa Parks RTI Framework
  • 8: Practice with the Tiers

Resources

  • 9: References, Additional Resources, and Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
Provide Feedback

What steps might the S-Team propose to help its struggling readers?

Page 7: The Rosa Parks RTI Framework

Click on the movie below to learn how the S-Team is going to begin implementing RTI, in practical terms, at Rosa Parks Elementary (time: 0:25).

/wp-content/uploads/module_media/rti01_overview_media/movies/rti01_07_a.mp4

View Transcript

Transcript: Implementing RTI

Since it took a fair amount of time for the S-Team to decide how best to help their struggling students, the third quarter is already in progress. The professionals at Rosa Parks Elementary decide to implement RTI at the beginning of the next academic year, starting with their first-grade classrooms. Let’s take a look at Mrs. Hernandez’s first-grade class to gain a better understanding of the RTI process that they have selected to implement.

Mrs. Hernandez is regarded as an effective teacher. In general, her students score well on the district’s annual high-stakes tests. Additionally, she uses scientifically based instructional methods to teach all of her subjects. It is important that she provide high-quality reading instruction to ensure that if a student ends up struggling, it is not due to lack of appropriate instruction.

Universal Screening

Having thoughtfully considered the resources available at their school, the S-Team and teachers at Rosa Parks Elementary have decided to target students scoring in the bottom 25 percent of each first-grade class participating in the universal screening for RTI. So at the beginning of the school year, Mrs. Hernandez begins the process by conducting reading screenings with all of her students.


Screening page

Group of childrenMost of Mrs. Hernandez’s students perform well on the screening. The chart to the left shows the individual student scores. However, Mrs. Hernandez has five students who exhibit difficulty: DeJuan, Megan, Ryan, LaToya, and Jack.

Click to view this chart

Student name Number of words read correctly in one minute
Hannah 20
Emma 17
Joshua 16
Mai 16
Chuck 15
Aidan 14
Miguel 14
Deangelo 13
Mario 13
Sophia 12
Ethan 12
Gabriella 12
Yeojin 12
Caleb 11
Shante 11
Katharine 10
Abigail 9
Dejuan 7
Megan 4
Ryan 4
Latoya 3
Jack 2

Tier 1: Class- or School-wide Interventions (Primary Prevention)

Students readingThe S-Team and the teachers at Rosa Parks have decided that, in addition to providing the high-quality core reading program, Tier 1 instructors are to monitor all students’ progress on a weekly basis. This decision is based on research demonstrating that the simple use of progress monitoring improves students’ results. Therefore, everyone in Mrs. Hernandez’s class receives Tier 1 reading instruction, and the students’ scores are graphed so that Mrs. Hernandez can use them to determine whether the students need additional help. The data for the five struggling students, however, are being evaluated more carefully to determine whether Tier 1 instruction is sufficiently effective. After monitoring the data for eight weeks, Megan now shows adequate progress, and she doesn’t require additional instruction. But the progress monitoring data for DeJuan, Ryan, LaToya, and Jack indicate that they are still struggling.

Tier 2: Targeted Interventions (Secondary Prevention)

Students readingDeJuan, Ryan, LaToya, and Jack now receive Tier 2 intervention. In addition to the high-quality Tier 1 reading instruction they receive with Mrs. Hernandez, they also receive a more intensive, small-group reading intervention from Ms. Washington, the school’s reading specialist. Ms. Washington will continue to monitor their progress in the small group.

After 12 weeks of Tier 2 intervention, DeJuan has made adequate progress and is now reading at grade level. He no longer requires the intensive small-group intervention. As a result, DeJuan will no longer receive Tier 2 intervention but will instead receive only the Tier 1 instruction with the rest of his general education classmates instead. LaToya and Ryan are making progress but are not yet reading at grade level. Ms. Washington and Mrs. Hernandez decide to continue Tier 2 interventions with these students. The data show that small-group instruction works for them, so it makes sense to continue their current intervention. On the other hand, Jack’s responsiveness is far less than desired. Because Jack has not made adequate progress after receiving Tier 2 services, he will receive more intensive and individualized services (i.e., Tier 3 intervention).

Tier 3: Intensive, Individualized Interventions (Tertiary Preventions)

Mr. John with a studentJack’s response to instruction has not been adequate enough to bring his skills to an acceptable level. High-quality, research-validated instruction was used with Jack for Tier 1 and 2 instruction, so the S-Team members can rule out inappropriate instruction as a cause for his difficulties. The S-Team also notes that additional support through small-group instruction, Tier 2 intervention, proved insufficient to meet Jack’s needs. The team decides that more intensive, individualized instruction is necessary. The S-Team suspects that Jack may require special education services and begins the referral process.

Click here to get more information on the referral process.

Mr. Johnson, the school psychologist, will evaluate Jack with a battery of assessments that address (at a minimum):

  • Intellectual ability
  • Behavior
  • Speech and language
  • Sensory proficiency (e.g., visual and auditory)

These assessments can confirm or rule out the existence of other disabilities such as intellectual disabilities, emotional and behavioral disorders, speech or language impairments, visual disabilities, and hearing impairments, and determine whether certain related services (e.g., speech or language therapy) are necessary.

Note: The referral and assessment process is not part of Tier 3 services.

If the results of the evaluation show that Jack has a disability, he can receive special education services.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
123456789
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Careers at IRIS
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected]. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Sarah Allen.

Copyright 2025 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok