• IRIS Center
  • COVID-19 RESOURCES
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • IRIS Alignment Tools
      HLPs, SiMRs, & CEEDAR ICs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • For Faculty
      Sample syllabi, curriculum matrices, & more
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Independent Learners
      Resources & tools for independent learners
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
    • Micro-credentials
      Short. Focused. Intense.
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • Learner Outcomes
      Summaries of module effectiveness
    • Consumer Satisfaction
      Feedback and testimonials from IRIS users
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • About
    • Who We Are
      Our team, experts, & advisors
    • What We Do
      Our resources & process
    • Contact Us
      Get in touch with IRIS
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • AAA
  • Module
  • Challenge
  • Initial Thoughts
  • Perspectives & Resources
  • Wrap Up
  • Assessment
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What procedures do you think Rosa Parks Elementary is using to provide services to struggling students? Why are school personnel dissatisfied with this process? (Opinion Question: No Resources)

What approaches are available to schools to help struggling readers and to efficiently identify students who need special education services?

  • Page 1: Struggling Readers
  • Page 2: The IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model
  • Page 3: The Response-to-Intervention Approach (RTI)

What other information might a school find helpful when choosing which approach to adopt?

  • Page 4: The Rationale for RTI: Early Intervening and Identification of Learning Disabilities
  • Page 5: Approaches to RTI

What steps might the S-Team propose to help its struggling readers?

  • Page 6: Steps to This RTI Approach
  • Page 7: The Rosa Parks RTI Framework
  • Page 8: Practice with the Tiers

Resources

  • Page 9: References & Additional Resources
  • Page 10: Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
We want to hear from you. Please complete our brief Module Feedback Form.

What steps might the S-Team propose to help its struggling readers?

Page 7: The Rosa Parks RTI Framework

Click on the movie below to learn how the S-Team is going to begin implementing RTI, in practical terms, at Rosa Parks Elementary (time: 0:25).

/wp-content/uploads/module_media/rti01_overview_media/movies/rti01_07_a.mp4

View Transcript

Transcript: Implementing RTI

Since it took a fair amount of time for the S-Team to decide how best to help their struggling students, the third quarter is already in progress. The professionals at Rosa Parks Elementary decide to implement RTI at the beginning of the next academic year, starting with their first-grade classrooms. Let’s take a look at Mrs. Hernandez’s first-grade class to gain a better understanding of the RTI process that they have selected to implement.

Mrs. Hernandez is regarded as an effective teacher. In general, her students score well on the district’s annual high-stakes tests. Additionally, she uses scientifically based instructional methods to teach all of her subjects. It is important that she provide high-quality reading instruction to ensure that if a student ends up struggling, it is not due to lack of appropriate instruction.

Universal Screening

Having thoughtfully considered the resources available at their school, the S-Team and teachers at Rosa Parks Elementary have decided to target students scoring in the bottom 25 percent of each first-grade class participating in the universal screening for RTI. So at the beginning of the school year, Mrs. Hernandez begins the process by conducting reading screenings with all of her students.


Screening page

Group of childrenMost of Mrs. Hernandez’s students perform well on the screening. The chart to the left shows the individual student scores. However, Mrs. Hernandez has five students who exhibit difficulty: DeJuan, Megan, Ryan, LaToya, and Jack.

Click to view this chart

Student name Number of words read correctly in one minute
Hannah 20
Emma 17
Joshua 16
Mai 16
Chuck 15
Aidan 14
Miguel 14
Deangelo 13
Mario 13
Sophia 12
Ethan 12
Gabriella 12
Yeojin 12
Caleb 11
Shante 11
Katharine 10
Abigail 9
Dejuan 7
Megan 4
Ryan 4
Latoya 3
Jack 2

Tier 1: Class- or School-wide Interventions (Primary Prevention)

Students readingThe S-Team and the teachers at Rosa Parks have decided that, in addition to providing the high-quality core reading program, Tier 1 instructors are to monitor all students’ progress on a weekly basis. This decision is based on research demonstrating that the simple use of progress monitoring improves students’ results. Therefore, everyone in Mrs. Hernandez’s class receives Tier 1 reading instruction, and the students’ scores are graphed so that Mrs. Hernandez can use them to determine whether the students need additional help. The data for the five struggling students, however, are being evaluated more carefully to determine whether Tier 1 instruction is sufficiently effective. After monitoring the data for eight weeks, Megan now shows adequate progress, and she doesn’t require additional instruction. But the progress monitoring data for DeJuan, Ryan, LaToya, and Jack indicate that they are still struggling.

Tier 2: Targeted Interventions (Secondary Prevention)

Students readingDeJuan, Ryan, LaToya, and Jack now receive Tier 2 intervention. In addition to the high-quality Tier 1 reading instruction they receive with Mrs. Hernandez, they also receive a more intensive, small-group reading intervention from Ms. Washington, the school’s reading specialist. Ms. Washington will continue to monitor their progress in the small group.

After 12 weeks of Tier 2 intervention, DeJuan has made adequate progress and is now reading at grade level. He no longer requires the intensive small-group intervention. As a result, DeJuan will no longer receive Tier 2 intervention but will instead receive only the Tier 1 instruction with the rest of his general education classmates instead. LaToya and Ryan are making progress but are not yet reading at grade level. Ms. Washington and Mrs. Hernandez decide to continue Tier 2 interventions with these students. The data show that small-group instruction works for them, so it makes sense to continue their current intervention. On the other hand, Jack’s responsiveness is far less than desired. Because Jack has not made adequate progress after receiving Tier 2 services, he will receive more intensive and individualized services (i.e., Tier 3 intervention).

Tier 3: Intensive, Individualized Interventions (Tertiary Preventions)

Mr. John with a studentJack’s response to instruction has not been adequate enough to bring his skills to an acceptable level. High-quality, research-validated instruction was used with Jack for Tier 1 and 2 instruction, so the S-Team members can rule out inappropriate instruction as a cause for his difficulties. The S-Team also notes that additional support through small-group instruction, Tier 2 intervention, proved insufficient to meet Jack’s needs. The team decides that more intensive, individualized instruction is necessary. The S-Team suspects that Jack may require special education services and begins the referral process.

Click here to get more information on the referral process.

Mr. Johnson, the school psychologist, will evaluate Jack with a battery of assessments that address (at a minimum):

  • Intellectual ability
  • Behavior
  • Speech and language
  • Sensory proficiency (e.g., visual and auditory)

These assessments can confirm or rule out the existence of other disabilities such as intellectual disabilities, emotional and behavioral disorders, speech or language impairments, visual disabilities, and hearing impairments, and determine whether certain related services (e.g., speech or language therapy) are necessary.

Note: The referral and assessment process is not part of Tier 3 services.

If the results of the evaluation show that Jack has a disability, he can receive special education services.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
12345678910
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Our Values
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 iris@vanderbilt.edu. The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E170001. The contents of this Website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Sarah Allen.

Copyright 2021 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College