• IRIS Center
COVID-19 RESOURCES
Careers at IRIS
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • IRIS Alignment Tools
      HLPs, SiMRs, & CEEDAR ICs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • For Faculty
      Sample syllabi, curriculum matrices, & more
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Independent Learners
      Resources & tools for independent learners
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • Learner Outcomes
      Summaries of module effectiveness
    • Consumer Satisfaction
      Feedback and testimonials from IRIS users
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • About
    • Who We Are
      Our team, experts, & advisors
    • What We Do
      Our resources & process
    • Contact Us
      Get in touch with IRIS
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • Module
  • Challenge
  • Initial Thoughts
  • Perspectives & Resources
  • Wrap Up
  • Assessment
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What procedures do you think Rosa Parks Elementary is using to provide services to struggling students? Why are school personnel dissatisfied with this process? (Opinion Question: No Resources)

What approaches are available to schools to help struggling readers and to efficiently identify students who need special education services?

  • Page 1: Struggling Readers
  • Page 2: The IQ-Achievement Discrepancy Model
  • Page 3: The Response-to-Intervention Approach (RTI)

What other information might a school find helpful when choosing which approach to adopt?

  • Page 4: The Rationale for RTI: Early Intervening and Identification of Learning Disabilities
  • Page 5: Approaches to RTI

What steps might the S-Team propose to help its struggling readers?

  • Page 6: Steps to This RTI Approach
  • Page 7: The Rosa Parks RTI Framework
  • Page 8: Practice with the Tiers

Resources

  • Page 9: References & Additional Resources
  • Page 10: Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
We want to hear from you. Please complete our brief Module Feedback Form.

What approaches are available to schools to help struggling readers and to efficiently identify students who need special education services?

Page 3: The Response-to-Intervention Approach (RTI)

Click on the following movie and watch as the S-Team learns that there are other options for identifying learning disabilities (time: 0:48).

/wp-content/uploads/module_media/rti01_overview_media/movies/rti01_03_a.mp4

View Transcript

Transcript: Other Options for Identifying Learning Disabilities

Now that the S-Team understands why using the IQ-achievement discrepancy model often results in students having to wait a long time before receiving services, they wonder if there is a different approach to use. Ms. Jacobs, the special ed teacher, and Mrs. Hernandez, the S-Team’s lead teacher, attend a professional development meeting conducted by their state’s department of education, where they learn about a different method that is now allowed by the special education law that was passed in 2004—the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, or IDEA. They tell the S-Team about response to intervention, which has two purposes: to provide early support to students who are having academic difficulties and to offer an alternative to the discrepancy model.

What Is the Response-to-Intervention (RTI) Approach?

One basic premise of the RTI approach is that classroom instruction should be high quality; therefore, ineffective instruction can be ruled out as the reason for inadequate academic performance.

Teacher in classroomHigh-quality instruction involves the effective use of curriculum and instructional procedures that have been validated through rigorous research. These instructional procedures are referred to in a variety of ways: scientifically based practices, evidence-based instruction, and research-validated instruction.

In the RTI approach, struggling students’ skills are monitored to determine whether they show adequate growth (referred to as responsiveness) following the implementation of high-quality instruction. Students who do not respond adequately to research-validated instruction in the general education classroom are provided with increasingly intensive and validated interventions. Students’ progress in skill areas of concern is monitored frequently (e.g., weekly), and the data collected inform subsequent decisions about whether a student is either appropriately responsive or still needing more intensive instruction.

x

intervention

An instructional technique designed to improve or remediate a certain set of skills.

The RTI approach can be implemented in a variety of ways. In broad terms, RTI is a multi-level approach that is made of the following components.

  • Universal screening: All students are given a screening measure. Students at risk for academic failure are identified.
  • Tier 1: Students receive effective, research-validated instruction in the general education setting. Student progress is monitored on a weekly basis. (In some approaches, universal screening is considered part of Tier 1.)
  • Tier 2: Students whose progress is less than desired receive different or additional support from the classroom teacher or another educational professional. Student progress continues to be monitored.
  • Tier 3: Students whose progress is still insufficient in response to Tier 2 instruction may receive even more intensive instruction, which can be provided in a variety of ways. Then, depending on a state’s or district’s policies, students may qualify for special education services based on the progress monitoring data, or they may receive either an abbreviated or comprehensive evaluation for the identification of a learning disability.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) allows states and school districts to use either the IQ-achievement discrepancy model or the RTI approach for determining special education eligibility for students with learning disabilities. Key features of each option are noted in the table below.

IQ-Achievement
Discrepancy
Model
Response
-to-
Intervention
Approach
What is the underlying purpose? To eliminate low intellectual ability (IQ) as the reason for reading problems To eliminate inadequate instruction as the reason for reading problems
Who is targeted? Students with suspected learning disabilities Struggling readers

Students with suspected learning disabilities

What process is used?

A prescribed set of standardized tests

Identification of discrepancy between IQ scores and achievement scores

Ongoing monitoring of students’ performance

Data-driven decisions leading to increasingly intensive services

What information is typically used?

Scores from standardized tests of intelligence (IQ) (e.g., Stanford-Binet)

Scores from standardized tests of achievement (e.g., Woodcock-Johnson Achievement Test)

Data collected frequently on students’ performance

Possibly some standardized test scores

Who is responsible for collecting the data? Primarily a certified diagnostician or school psychologist Primarily the general education teacher or other personnel responsible for instructional interventions
What are the data used for? To identify whether a disability exists To guide instructional placement
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
12345678910
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Our Values
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected] The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this Website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Sarah Allen.

Copyright 2023 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College