• IRIS Center
Careers at IRIS
Donate to IRIS
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • IRIS Alignment Tools
      HLPs, SiMRs, & CEEDAR ICs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • For Faculty
      Sample syllabi, curriculum matrices, & more
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Independent Learners
      Resources & tools for independent learners
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • Learner Outcomes
      Summaries of module effectiveness
    • Consumer Satisfaction
      Feedback and testimonials from IRIS users
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • About
    • Who We Are
      Our team, experts, & advisors
    • What We Do
      Our resources & process
    • Contact Us
      Get in touch with IRIS
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • Module
  • Challenge
  • Initial Thoughts
  • Perspectives & Resources
  • Wrap Up
  • Assessment
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What is an IEP?

  • Page 1: Overview of High-Quality IEPs
  • Page 2: Endrew F. & IEP Standards

What is the IEP process?

  • Page 3: The IEP Process
  • Page 4: Procedural Requirements: Guidelines & Common Errors

What is included in the IEP document?

  • Page 5: The IEP Content
  • Page 6: High-Quality PLAAFP Statements
  • Page 7: Challenging, Ambitious, Measurable Annual Goals
  • Page 8: Individualized Services & Supports
  • Page 9: Monitoring & Reporting Student Progress
  • Page 10: Substantive Requirements: Common Errors

Resources

  • Page 11: References & Additional Resources
  • Page 12: Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
We want to hear from you. Please complete our brief Module Feedback Form.

IEPs: Developing High-Quality Individualized Education Programs

Wrap Up

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) is the law that governs the education of students with disabilities. Through this law, students with disabilities are entitled to a free, appropriate public education (FAPE) that includes an IEP. The IEP serves as the blueprint for the services and supports necessary to meet the student’s unique needs and guides every facet of her special education program.

IEP teams need to adhere to both procedural and substantive requirements. In 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District required a higher substantive standard for determining whether a student’s IEP is conferring educational benefit: It must be reasonably calculated to enable a student to make progress appropriate in light of her circumstances. The table below summarizes these requirements, taking into consideration both IDEA and the Endrew ruling.

Procedural Requirements

Ensure that the IEP process (the how and when of IEP development) is followed:

  • Referral
  • Evaluation
  • Eligibility determination

  • IEP development
  • IEP implementation
  • Annual review
  • Reevaluation

Ensure that the IEP contains all of the required information:

  • PLAAFP statements
  • Measurable annual goals
  • Description of special education and related services and supplementary services
  • Method for measuring and reporting progress
  • Explanation of the extent the student will not be educated with nondisabled students in the general education setting
  • Statement of student’s participation in state and district-wide assessments
  • The date of service initiation, frequency, duration, and location

An IEP that meets procedural requirements could be considered a technically sound IEP. Failure to follow the IEP process or to implement the steps properly results in a procedural error that jeopardizes the student’s FAPE.

Substantive Requirements

Ensure that the quality of the IEP content (the what of IEP development) is sufficient to enable the student to progress:

  • PLAAFP statements — Based on a thorough evaluation, address each of a student’s needs, and is sufficient to both serve as a baseline and inform the annual goals
  • Measurable annual goals — Based on the PLAAFP statements, are sufficiently challenging and ambitious to confer meaningful educational benefit
  • Description of special education and related services and supplementary services — Based on the annual goals and using evidence-based practices as much as possible, are sufficient to help the student make progress toward meeting her academic and/or functional annual goals
  • Method for measuring and reporting progress — Based on the annual goals, includes a plan for collecting objective data and reporting progress to parents, ensure that changes are made if the student’s progress is not adequate (i.e., data-based decisions)

The quality of these components must meet the Endrew substantive standard. An IEP that does so could be considered an educationally meaningful IEP. Failure to develop a high-quality IEP that meets these standards can jeopardize the student’s FAPE.

In this interview, Mitchell Yell summarizes best practices in IEP development (time 1:11).

mitch yell

Mitchell Yell, PhD
Fred and Francis Lester Palmetto Chair in Teacher Education
Professor, Special Education
University of South Carolina

/wp-content/uploads/module_media/iep01_media/audio/iep01_wrap_yell.mp3

View Transcript

Transcript: Mitchell Yell, PhD

In terms of best practice, we have to be doing a relevant assessment of all of a child’s needs, making certain it’s linked to the goals and the services that you provide and then having a method for monitoring progress that’s easy and user-friendly. And especially important is the notion that our present level statements have to serve as a baseline. Because if we are writing measurable goals and monitoring progress, if we don’t know where we started, it’s very difficult to say where we’re going or if we get there. And if you see a child who is not progressing then you can make changes in the child’s instruction and continue to collect data. If we can do that, substantively, we almost have a bulletproof IEP because that’s what the law requires. What the Endrew decision requires is that we always keep our eye on a student’s progress. If we’re actually collecting data on student progress and we can show student progress and make data-based instructional changes, if necessary, that’s what is going to benefit the student.

Revisiting Initial Thoughts

Think back to your responses to the Initial Thoughts questions at the beginning of this Module. After working through the Perspectives & Resources, do you still agree with those responses? If not, what aspects about them would you change?

What is an IEP?

What is the IEP process?

What is included in the IEP document?

When you are ready, proceed to the Assessment section.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Our Values
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected] The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this Website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Sarah Allen.

Copyright 2023 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College