• IRIS Center
Careers at IRIS
Donate to IRIS
  • Resources
    • IRIS Resource Locator
      Modules, case studies, activities, & more
    • Evidence-Based Practice Summaries
      Research annotations
    • High-Leverage Practices
      IRIS resources on HLPs
    • IRIS Alignment Tools
      HLPs, SiMRs, & CEEDAR ICs
    • Films
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • Children's Books
      Portrayals of people with disabilities
    • For Faculty
      Sample syllabi, curriculum matrices, & more
    • For PD Providers
      Sample PD activities, planning forms, & more
    • For Independent Learners
      Resources & tools for independent learners
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
    • New & Coming Soon
      Latest modules & resources
    • Glossary
      Disability related terms
  • PD Options
    • PD Certificates for Educators
      Our certificate, your PD hours
    • School & District Platform
      A powerful tool for school leaders
    • Log in to Your IRIS PD
  • Articles & Reports
    • Articles
      Articles about IRIS use & efficacy
    • Internal IRIS Reports
      Reports on IRIS use & accomplishments
    • External Evaluation Reports
      Evaluations of the IRIS Center
    • Learner Outcomes
      Summaries of module effectiveness
    • Consumer Satisfaction
      Feedback and testimonials from IRIS users
    • IRIS Stories
      Our resources, your stories
    • News & Events
      What, when, & where it's happening
  • About
    • Who We Are
      Our team, experts, & advisors
    • What We Do
      Our resources & process
    • Contact Us
      Get in touch with IRIS
  • Help
    • Help & Support
      Get the full benefit from our resources
    • Website Navigation Videos
      Getting around our Website & modules
  • Module
  • Challenge
  • Initial Thoughts
  • Perspectives & Resources
  • Wrap Up
  • Assessment
Challenge
Initial Thoughts
Perspectives & Resources

What is data-based individualization?

  • Page 1: Overview of Data-Based Individualization

How can school personnel use data to make instructional decisions?

  • Page 2: Collecting and Evaluating Data
  • Page 3: Progress Monitoring
  • Page 4: Analyzing Progress Monitoring Data
  • Page 5: Diagnostic Assessment
  • Page 6: Error Analysis for Reading
  • Page 7: Error Analysis for Mathematics
  • Page 8: Making Data-Based Instructional Decisions for Reading
  • Page 9: Making Data-Based Instructional Decisions for Mathematics

Resources

  • Page 10: References & Additional Resources
  • Page 11: Credits
Wrap Up
Assessment
We want to hear from you. Please complete our brief Module Feedback Form.

How can school personnel use data to make instructional decisions?

Page 4: Analyzing Progress Monitoring Data

After making adaptations to an intervention, the teacher needs to collect and analyze progress monitoring data to determine how the student is responding to the intervention. To obtain a reliable estimate, he or she must collect data for a minimum of six weeks (or six data points if data are collected more than once per week). After graphing the data, the teacher can evaluate the student’s performance using the Four-Point Method, an easy method for examining the relationship between the four most recent data points and the goal line. The figures below illustrate how a teacher can interpret the information from the student’s graph using the Four-Point Method.

This graphic illustrates student performance above the goal line. A diagonal red goal line rests beneath the student’s blue data line on a graph. The final four data points on the student’s line are circled. At all points, the student’s data line is above the goal line. If most of the four most recent data points are on or above the goal line, the student is demonstrating improved outcomes. The teacher should continue with the current instructional program.
This graphic illustrates student performance below the goal line. A diagonal red goal line rests above the student’s blue data line on a graph. The final four data points on the student’s line are circled. At all points, the student’s data line is beneath the goal line. If most of the four most recent data points are below the goal line and data indicate that the child or student will not meet the benchmark, performance is not improving. It is time for the teacher to make an instructional change.

For Your Information

Another way a teacher can evaluate the student’s performance is to use trend line analysis. Although this method is more reliable for evaluating a student’s performance, it requires more time and expertise. Click here to learn more about this process.

Listen as Sarah Arden discusses how long a teacher should implement an intervention before deciding whether or not the student is making adequate progress (time: 0:51).

Sarah Arden, PhD
Technical Assistance Team,
National Center on Intensive Intervention

/wp-content/uploads/module_media/dbi2_media/audio/dbi2_p04_sa.mp3

View Transcript

Sarah Arden, PhD

Transcript: Sarah Arden, PhD

So research tells us that intervention should be implemented for about six to eight weeks for younger students. Research tells us that for older students—middle school, high school students—sometimes they need longer to show that they’re making progress, so maybe even up to twelve weeks you can keep them in intervention. However, during those intervention periods progress should always be monitored, and if you know for sure that something just really isn’t working or it’s going really poorly we always say to make instructional adaptations and changes. But you have to give students a little bit of time to get in there, and what I mean by that is that they have to be receiving intervention with fidelity, it has to be valid, and it needs to be reliable. So at least six to eight weeks of valid reliable intervention happening with fidelity before you decide to make any intense changes.

Activity

Review Natalia’s progress monitoring graph below. Using the Four-Point Method, evaluate Natalia’s progress. (Hint: Analyze the data points in the portion of the graph labeled “Quantitative & Qualitative Changes.”)

large_graph_3

Description

This graph displays Natalia’s progress monitoring data over a span of seventeen weeks, which here form the x-axis and which is divided by a vertical blue dotted line after Week 7. The left side of this line is labeled “Tier 2,” whereas the section after the line is labeled “Quantitative Changes.” At Week eleven and a half, another vertical dotted line divides the graph. From that point until Week 17, the graph is labeled “Quantitative and Qualitative Changes.”

The y-axis is labeled “Words Correct Per Minute” and is divided into five word increments with a gap between 0 and 40 where there is no data. Natalia’s goal line is represented by a red line that runs through 42 words per minute for Week 1 and 78 words per minute for Week 17.

Natalia’s actual correct words per minute are represented by a blue line that indicates the following: Week 1—43 words per minute, Week 2—46 words per minute, Week 3—46 words per minute, Week 4—51 words per minute, Week 5—53 words per minute, Week 6—48 words per minute, Week 7—57 words per minute, Week 8—58 words per minute, Week 9—60 words per minute, Week 10—55 words per minute, Week 11—60 words per minute, Week 12—60 words per minute, Week 13—63 words per minute, Week 14—68 words per minute, Week 15—70 words per minute, Week 16—70 words per minute, and Week 17—73 words per minute. At all points, Natalia progress is beneath her goal line.

Select the answer below that indicates how Natalia is performing.

Improving

Incorrect: Most of the four most recent data points are below the goal line. Therefore, the data indicate that Natalia is not improving.

Not improving

Correct: Most of the four most recent data points are below the goal line. Therefore, the data indicate that Natalia is not improving.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Back Next
12345678...11
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up
  • Home
  • About IRIS
  • Our Values
  • Sitemap
  • Web Accessibility
  • Glossary
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
Join Our E-Newsletter Sign Up

The IRIS Center Peabody College Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37203 [email protected] The IRIS Center is funded through a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) Grant #H325E220001. The contents of this Website do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Project Officer, Sarah Allen.

Copyright 2023 Vanderbilt University. All rights reserved.

* For refund and privacy policy information visit our Help & Support page.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

  • Vanderbilt Peabody College